MTB Tire Guide
Kenda Booster Pro MTB tire (XC, 29")

Image: manufacturer · Source

Kenda

Booster Pro

XC
Front+Rear
Intermediate
Tubeless ready
Short answer:

Tested

Weaker in comparison

35.3 W · rank 20 of 20 comparable XC tires

18.6 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.

XC-Reifen von Kenda mit dichtem Profil.

Weight
739 g
Variant
–
Compound
RSR
Grip class
Speed-Grip
Casing
SCT
TPI
–
Reinforcement
–
Wheel sizes
29", 27.5"
Widths
2.4"
Front pressure
20–26 psi (1.38–1.79 bar)
Rear pressure
22–28 psi (1.52–1.93 bar)
Price (MSRP)
49–65 €
Model year
2025

Configure your build

Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.

Tire width
Wheel size
27.5" wheel
29" wheel
Pressure (context)
Measured point
Measured value available
How we calculate

Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.

Reference: recommended pressure 24 psi (1.65 bar) – an assumption, not a test pressure.

More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.

Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.

Rating profile

3 of 8 criteria rated

Editorial assessment on a 1–10 scale. Grip index: 6.9

Change build

TestedYour build – derived

These grades describe the tire model, not one specific width or compound – no reliable per-version grades exist.

Individual scores

  • Rolling resistance3.4/10
  • Wet grip6.9/10
  • Puncture protection3.4/10

No data

  • Dry grip
  • Cornering grip
  • Braking traction
  • Durability
  • Comfort/damping

Scores from 1 to 10: higher is better.

Sizes & variants

Every variant the manufacturer lists, with its own claimed data. Missing values stay blank.

15 variants
27.5"2.2" · 56 mmTRSingle551 g
27.5"2.2" · 56 mmSCTSingle619 g
27.5"2.4" · 61 mmTRSingle598 g
27.5"2.4" · 61 mmSCTSingle666 g
27.5"2.6" · 66 mmTRSingle641 g
27.5"2.6" · 66 mmSCTSingle721 g
27.5"2.8" · 71 mmTRSingle710 g
27.5"2.8" · 71 mmSCTSingle814 g
29"2.2" · 56 mmTRSingle589 g
29"2.2" · 56 mmSCTSingle670 g
29"2.4" · 61 mmTRSingle624 g
29"2.4" · 61 mmSCTSingle690 g
29"2.4" · 61 mmSCT CSKSingle725 g
29"2.6" · 66 mmTRSingle681 g
29"2.6" · 66 mmSCTSingle763 g

The value in brackets is our brand-neutral casing class (Light, Trail, Enduro, Downhill) – not a manufacturer statement.

Source: manufacturer data

Measured values

Lab data

Real test-rig values – not an estimate. Tested variant: Booster Pro SCT 2.4 (gemessene Variante).

Watts measured on the test rig: lower is better. The 1-10 ratings on this page: higher is better.

No lab of our own: measurements come from the third-party test named above – the source is linked directly.

Rolling resistancemeasured at 28 psi (1.93 bar)
35.3 W

Rank 20 of 20 · lower is better

Impact protection tread
30 points
Wet grip measurementHard surface, not off-road
67 points

Rank 7 of 20 · higher is better

Tread rubber thickness
2.1 mm
Weighed weight
739 g

Rank 13 of 20 · lower is better

Measured widthon a 17.8 mm rim
56 mm
Source: Bicycle Rolling Resistance · January 2026To the test

Automatic assessment

Tested: Calculated from the stored measurements – compared only within the same test series and category (XC).

  • Rolling resistance

    Weaker in comparison

    35.3 W · rank 20 of 20 comparable XC tires

    18.6 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.

  • Wet grip measurement

    Mid-field

    67 points · rank 7 of 20 comparable XC tires

    5 points behind the best value in the same test series. More points means more compound grip on smooth surfaces.

  • Weighed weight

    Mid-field

    739 g · rank 13 of 20 comparable XC tires

    147 g behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer grams is better, but usually costs casing stability.

Measurements from different test rigs are not directly comparable – Sources & method.

Similar tires