Hutchinson Python Race
XC
Front+Rear
Hutchinson Python Race vs Maxxis Aspen ST
Short answer: Rolling resistance: Hutchinson Python Race leads with 24.5 W, Maxxis Aspen ST trails by 2.2 W.
Maxxis Aspen ST
XC
Front+Rear
Configure your build
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Hutchinson Python Race
Maxxis Aspen ST
Measured value available
How we calculate
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Hutchinson Python Race: Reference: recommended pressure 24 psi (1.65 bar) – an assumption, not a test pressure.
Maxxis Aspen ST: Reference: recommended pressure 24 psi (1.65 bar) – an assumption, not a test pressure.
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Size, weight and casing
| Hutchinson Python Race | Maxxis Aspen ST | |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 2.4" (61 mm) | 2.4" (61 mm) |
| Wheel sizes | 29" · 27.5" | 29" · 27.5" |
| Weight | 592 g | 699 g |
| Casing | Racing Lab | EXO |
| Casing | Light | Trail |
| TPI | – | – |
| Tread type | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| Tubeless ready | yes | yes |
| E-MTB approval | no | no |
| Price from | €54 | €64 |
| Model year | 2025 | 2024 |
Rubber compounds
Hardness scale 1 = hard and fast to 5 = very soft and grippy (our own classification).
Both tires sit in the same grip class – the watt comparison is fair.
Both tires sit on the same step of our editorial hardness scale.
Lab data per version
| Hutchinson Python Race | Maxxis Aspen ST | |
|---|---|---|
| Rolling resistance (W) | 24.5 W | 26.7 W |
| Wet grip measurement (points) | 59.0 points | 65.0 points |
| Weighed weight (g) | 592.0 g | 699.0 g |
- Source: Bicycle Rolling Resistance
Hutchinson Python Race
Maxxis Aspen ST
Compounds & versions as curves
Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.
- 27.7 W at 24 psi (1.65 bar) · Reference
- Wet grip (lab)
- 59
- Puncture
- –
- Weight
- 592 g
- 30.2 W at 24 psi (1.65 bar) · +2.5 W
- Wet grip (lab)
- 65
- Puncture
- –
- Weight
- 699 g
The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.
Variants head to head
Every measured variant of the selected tires – the same model in another compound, width or casing sits right next to it. Empty fields mean no reliable measurement.
| Hutchinson Python RacePython Race Racing Lab 2.4 | 24.5 W | – | 592 g |
| Maxxis Aspen STAspen ST MaxxSpeed EXO/TR Team Spec 2.4 | 26.7 W | – | 699 g |
Charts
Rolling resistance (fewer watts is better)
Impact protection (higher is better)
No values are available for this selection.
Editorial rating (higher is better)
TestedYour build – derived
Recommendation by use
- Fast laps and long climbs: Hutchinson Python Race rolls easier at 24.5 W.
- Wet roots and slippery ground: Maxxis Aspen ST has the better wet grip.
Tested
- Rolling resistance: Hutchinson Python Race leads with 24.5 W, Maxxis Aspen ST trails by 2.2 W.
- Wet grip measurement: Maxxis Aspen ST leads with 65 points, Hutchinson Python Race trails by 6 points.
- Weighed weight: Hutchinson Python Race leads with 592 g, Maxxis Aspen ST trails by 107 g.
Tests and sources
No test references are on file for these two tires yet.