
Image: manufacturer · Source
Pirelli
Scorpion Race DH M
Tested
Weaker in comparison
51.7 W · rank 3 of 3 comparable Downhill tires
3.7 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.
- Weight
- 1450 g
- Variant
- 29x2.5 DualWALL+
- Compound
- SmartEVO DH
- Grip class
- Max Grip
- Casing
- DualWALL+
- TPI
- 60
- Reinforcement
- –
- Wheel sizes
- 27.5", 29"
- Widths
- 2.5"
- Front pressure
- –
- Rear pressure
- –
- Price (MSRP)
- 90–90 €
- Model year
- 2022
Configure your build
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
How we calculate
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Rating profile
0 of 8 criteria ratedEditorial assessment on a 1–10 scale. Grip index: –
No editorial scores
There are no 1–10 scores for this tire yet. We do not invent values.
Laboratory measurements are available – see the measurements block.
How we rateIndividual scores
No data
- Rolling resistance
- Wet grip
- Dry grip
- Cornering grip
- Braking traction
- Puncture protection
- Durability
- Comfort/damping
There are no 1–10 scores for this tire yet. We do not invent values.
Sizes & variants
Every variant the manufacturer lists, with its own claimed data. Missing values stay blank.
| 29" | 2.5" · 63 mm | DualWALL+(Enduro) | SmartEVO DH | 1450 g |
The value in brackets is our brand-neutral casing class (Light, Trail, Enduro, Downhill) – not a manufacturer statement.
Measured values
Real test-rig values – not an estimate. Tested variant: Scorpion Race DH M SmartEVO DH DualWALL+ 29 x 2.50.
Watts measured on the test rig: lower is better. The 1-10 ratings on this page: higher is better.
No lab of our own: measurements come from the third-party test named above – the source is linked directly.
- Rolling resistanceTest rig
- 51.7 W
- Impact protectionScore from the impact test
- 52.56 %
- Weighed weight
- 1551 g
Rank 3 of 3 · lower is better
Rank 2 of 3 · higher is better
Rank 3 of 3 · lower is better
Automatic assessment
Tested: Calculated from the stored measurements – compared only within the same test series and category (Downhill).
- Rolling resistance
Weaker in comparison
51.7 W · rank 3 of 3 comparable Downhill tires
3.7 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.
- Impact protection
Mid-field
52.6 % · rank 2 of 3 comparable Downhill tires
2 % behind the best value in the same test series. A higher percentage is better – the tire cushions hard edges for longer.
- Weighed weight
Weaker in comparison
1,551 g · rank 3 of 3 comparable Downhill tires
207 g behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer grams is better, but usually costs casing stability.
The familiar pattern: the high impact protection costs rolling resistance.
Measurements from different test rigs are not directly comparable – Sources & method.



