Continental Kryptotal Front
Enduro
Front
Continental Kryptotal Front vs Michelin Wild Enduro MH
Short answer: Rolling resistance: Continental Kryptotal Front leads with 35.2 W, Michelin Wild Enduro MH trails by 11.8 W.
Michelin Wild Enduro MH
Enduro
Front+Rear
Configure your build
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Continental Kryptotal Front
Michelin Wild Enduro MH
Measured value available
How we calculate
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Continental Kryptotal Front: Reference: test pressure 24.7 psi (1.70 bar).
Michelin Wild Enduro MH: Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Size, weight and casing
| Continental Kryptotal Front | Michelin Wild Enduro MH | |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 2.4" · 2.6" (60 · 65 mm) | 2.5" (63 mm) |
| Wheel sizes | 27.5" · 29" | 27.5" · 29" |
| Weight | 1,240 g (29x2.4 Enduro Soft) | 1,354 g (29x2.5 Racing Line) |
| Casing | Enduro Casing · Apex · 2-ply | DH Shield · 2-ply |
| Casing | Trail · Enduro · Downhill | Light |
| TPI | 110 | 55 |
| Tread type | Aggressive | – |
| Tubeless ready | yes | yes |
| E-MTB approval | yes | yes |
| Price from | €70 | €80 |
| Model year | 2022 | 2024 |
Rubber compounds
Hardness scale 1 = hard and fast to 5 = very soft and grippy (our own classification).
Both tires sit in the same grip class – the watt comparison is fair.
Both tires sit on the same step of our editorial hardness scale.
Lab data per version
| Continental Kryptotal Front | Michelin Wild Enduro MH | |
|---|---|---|
| Rolling resistance (W) | 35.2 W | 47.0 W |
| Impact protection (%) | 28.4 % | 46.2 % |
| Puncture resistance (N) | 420.4 N | – |
| Weighed weight (g) | 1,167.0 g | 1,229.0 g |
These two tires have no measured values from the same test series. A direct comparison of numbers would not be sound.
Continental Kryptotal Front
All tested versions
Test series: ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest 64 Reifen
Measured values per compound and casing from the same laboratory test. Empty cells mean no reliable value was published.
| Kryptotal-Fr Soft Compound Enduro-Casing | 29 x 2.40 | 35.2 W | 28.35 % | 1167 g | 69.95 € |
| Kryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Downhill-Casing | 29 x 2.40 | 41.5 W | 51.42 % | 1310 g | 89.95 € |
| Kryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Enduro-Casing | 29 x 2.40 | 42.3 W | 25.96 % | 1208 g | 81.95 € |
Rolling resistance
lower is better
- Kryptotal-Fr Soft Compound Enduro-Casing35.2 W
- Kryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Downhill-Casing41.5 W
- Kryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Enduro-Casing42.3 W
Impact protection
higher is better
- Kryptotal-Fr Soft Compound Enduro-Casing28.35 %
- Kryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Downhill-Casing51.42 %
- Kryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Enduro-Casing25.96 %
Michelin Wild Enduro MH
Compounds & versions as curves
Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.
- 35.2 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · Reference
- Puncture
- 28.35 %
- Weight
- 1167 g
- 40.1 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · +4.9 W
- Puncture
- –
- Weight
- 1193 g
- 41.5 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · +6.3 W
- Puncture
- 51.42 %
- Weight
- 1310 g
- 42.3 W
- Puncture
- 25.96 %
- Weight
- 1208 g
- 47 W
- Puncture
- 46.2 %
- Weight
- 1229 g
Without a lab test pressure we anchor the measured watt value at the recommended pressure. The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.
Three curves at most – hide one first.
Variants head to head
Every measured variant of the selected tires – the same model in another compound, width or casing sits right next to it. Empty fields mean no reliable measurement.
| Continental Kryptotal FrontKryptotal Fr Super Soft Enduro · BIKE-Labor | 40.1 W | – | 1193 g |
| Continental Kryptotal FrontKryptotal-Fr Soft Compound Enduro-Casing | 35.2 W | 28.35 % | 1167 g |
| Continental Kryptotal FrontKryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Downhill-Casing | 41.5 W | 51.42 % | 1310 g |
| Continental Kryptotal FrontKryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Enduro-Casing | 42.3 W | 25.96 % | 1208 g |
| Michelin Wild Enduro MHWild Enduro MH RacingLine MAGI-X | 47 W | 46.2 % | 1229 g |
Charts
Rolling resistance (fewer watts is better)
Impact protection (higher is better)
Editorial rating (higher is better)
At least one tire is missing too many editorial scores for a radar profile. We never draw missing values as zero.
TestedYour build – derived
Recommendation by use
- Fast laps and long climbs: Continental Kryptotal Front rolls easier at 35.2 W.
- Bike park, rocks and e-MTB: Michelin Wild Enduro MH protects better with 46% impact protection.
Tested
- Rolling resistance: Continental Kryptotal Front leads with 35.2 W, Michelin Wild Enduro MH trails by 11.8 W.
- Impact protection: Michelin Wild Enduro MH leads with 46.2 %, Continental Kryptotal Front trails by 17.9 %.
- Weighed weight: Continental Kryptotal Front leads with 1,167 g, Michelin Wild Enduro MH trails by 62 g.
Tests and sources
Continental Kryptotal Front
In the 2026 enduro tyre test, the Kryptotal Fr competes alongside the Kryptotal Re. Testers praise the predictable handling and reliable grip thanks to the super-soft compound and sturdy enduro casing. As an all-rounder for tough enduro riding, the Kryptotal convinces.
BIKE MagazinThe editors tested the Kryptotal as front and rear tyre in Enduro and DH casings over several months. It impresses with high grip on varying terrain and good puncture protection. Overall, the hype around Continental's all-rounder is judged to be justified.
MTB-News.deENDURO's lab test measures 64 MTB tires under standardised conditions (20 km/h, 1.5 bar, 50 kg wheel load) for rolling resistance, pinch-flat protection and puncture resistance. Key takeaway: weight and pinch-flat protection are closely linked, while rolling resistance depends mainly on the rubber compound. Summarised in our own words; details and measured values at the original.
ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest