MTB Tire Guide

Hutchinson Python Race vs Schwalbe Racing Ralph

Short answer: Rolling resistance: Schwalbe Racing Ralph leads with 19 W, Hutchinson Python Race trails by 5.5 W.

Configure your build

Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.

Hutchinson Python Race

Pressure (context)
Measured point

Schwalbe Racing Ralph

Tire width
Wheel size
27.5" wheel
29" wheel
Casing
Compound
Pressure (context)
Measured point
Measured value available
How we calculate

Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.

Hutchinson Python Race: Reference: recommended pressure 24 psi (1.65 bar) – an assumption, not a test pressure.

Schwalbe Racing Ralph: Reference: recommended pressure 24 psi (1.65 bar) – an assumption, not a test pressure.

More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.

Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.

Size, weight and casing

Hutchinson Python RaceSchwalbe Racing Ralph
Width2.4" (61 mm)2.35" (60 mm)
Wheel sizes29" · 27.5"29" · 27.5"
Weight592 g758 g
CasingRacing LabSuper Ground
CasingLightLight · Trail
TPI––
Tread typeIntermediateIntermediate
Tubeless readyyesyes
E-MTB approvalnono
Price from€54€64
Model year20252023

Rubber compounds

Hardness scale 1 = hard and fast to 5 = very soft and grippy (our own classification).

Hutchinson Python Race

Grip class: Speed-Grip

Schwalbe Racing Ralph

Grip class: Speed · Speed-Grip

Both tires sit in the same grip class – the watt comparison is fair.

Both tires sit on the same step of our editorial hardness scale.

Lab data per version

Hutchinson Python RaceSchwalbe Racing Ralph
Rolling resistance (W)24.5 W
19.0 W
Wet grip measurement (points)59.0 points
58.0 points
Weighed weight (g)592.0 g
758.0 g

Hutchinson Python Race

Schwalbe Racing Ralph

All tested versions

Test series: Bicycle Rolling Resistance – MTB-Messreihe

Measured values per compound and casing from the same laboratory test. Empty cells mean no reliable value was published.

Racing Ralph Super Ground Addix Speed 2.3529 x 2.3519 W
58
29
–54 mm758 g
–
Racing Ralph Super Race Addix Speed 2.2529 x 2.2521.5 W
61
28
–52 mm659 g
–

Wet grip is measured in the lab on a hard wet surface – it is not off-road grip.

Rolling resistance

lower is better

  • Racing Ralph Super Ground Addix Speed 2.3519 W
  • Racing Ralph Super Race Addix Speed 2.2521.5 W

Compounds & versions as curves

Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.

12.325.638.852.165.3121927344249Pressure (psi)WBicycle Rolling Resistance: 19 W at 28 psi (1.93 bar) (measured)Bicycle Rolling Resistance: 21.5 W at 28 psi (1.93 bar) (measured)Bicycle Rolling Resistance: 24.5 W at 28 psi (1.93 bar) (measured)
  • 21.5 W at 24 psi (1.65 bar) · Reference
    Wet grip (lab)
    58
    Puncture
    –
    Weight
    758 g
  • 24.3 W at 24 psi (1.65 bar) · +2.8 W
    Wet grip (lab)
    58
    Puncture
    –
    Weight
    659 g
  • 27.7 W at 24 psi (1.65 bar) · +6.2 W
    Wet grip (lab)
    59
    Puncture
    –
    Weight
    592 g

The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.

Three curves at most – hide one first.

Variants head to head

Every measured variant of the selected tires – the same model in another compound, width or casing sits right next to it. Empty fields mean no reliable measurement.

Hutchinson Python RacePython Race Racing Lab 2.424.5 W
–592 g
Schwalbe Racing RalphRacing Ralph Super Ground Addix Speed 2.3519 W
–758 g
Schwalbe Racing RalphRacing Ralph Super Race Addix Speed 2.2521.5 W
–659 g

Charts

Rolling resistance (fewer watts is better)

Impact protection (higher is better)

No values are available for this selection.

Editorial rating (higher is better)

TestedYour build – derived

Recommendation by use

  • Fast laps and long climbs: Schwalbe Racing Ralph rolls easier at 19.0 W.
  • Wet roots and slippery ground: Hutchinson Python Race has the better wet grip.

Tested

  • Rolling resistance: Schwalbe Racing Ralph leads with 19 W, Hutchinson Python Race trails by 5.5 W.
  • Wet grip measurement: Hutchinson Python Race leads with 59 points, Schwalbe Racing Ralph trails by 1 points.
  • Weighed weight: Hutchinson Python Race leads with 592 g, Schwalbe Racing Ralph trails by 166 g.

Tests and sources

No test references are on file for these two tires yet.

More head-to-heads