Hutchinson Python Race
XC
Front+Rear
Hutchinson Python Race vs Schwalbe Racing Ray
Short answer: Rolling resistance: Schwalbe Racing Ray leads with 19.3 W, Hutchinson Python Race trails by 5.2 W.
Schwalbe Racing Ray
XC
Front+Rear
Configure your build
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Hutchinson Python Race
Schwalbe Racing Ray
Measured value available
How we calculate
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Hutchinson Python Race: Reference: recommended pressure 24 psi (1.65 bar) – an assumption, not a test pressure.
Schwalbe Racing Ray: Reference: recommended pressure 24 psi (1.65 bar) – an assumption, not a test pressure.
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Size, weight and casing
| Hutchinson Python Race | Schwalbe Racing Ray | |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 2.4" (61 mm) | 2.35" (60 mm) |
| Wheel sizes | 29" · 27.5" | 29" · 27.5" |
| Weight | 592 g | 748 g |
| Casing | Racing Lab | Super Race |
| Casing | Light | Light · Trail |
| TPI | – | – |
| Tread type | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| Tubeless ready | yes | yes |
| E-MTB approval | no | no |
| Price from | €54 | €69 |
| Model year | 2025 | 2026 |
Rubber compounds
Hardness scale 1 = hard and fast to 5 = very soft and grippy (our own classification).
Both tires sit in the same grip class – the watt comparison is fair.
Both tires sit on the same step of our editorial hardness scale.
Lab data per version
| Hutchinson Python Race | Schwalbe Racing Ray | |
|---|---|---|
| Rolling resistance (W) | 24.5 W | 19.3 W |
| Wet grip measurement (points) | 59.0 points | 63.0 points |
| Weighed weight (g) | 592.0 g | 748.0 g |
- Source: Bicycle Rolling Resistance
Hutchinson Python Race
Schwalbe Racing Ray
All tested versions
Test series: Bicycle Rolling Resistance – MTB-Messreihe
Measured values per compound and casing from the same laboratory test. Empty cells mean no reliable value was published.
| Racing Ray Super Ground Addix SpeedGrip 2.25 | 29 x 2.25 | 20.4 W | 68 | 27 | – | 55 mm | 685 g | – |
| Racing Ray Super Race 2.35 | 29 x 2.35 | 19.3 W | 63 | 29 | – | 54 mm | 748 g | – |
Wet grip is measured in the lab on a hard wet surface – it is not off-road grip.
Rolling resistance
lower is better
- Racing Ray Super Race 2.3519.3 W
- Racing Ray Super Ground Addix SpeedGrip 2.2520.4 W
Compounds & versions as curves
Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.
- 21.8 W at 24 psi (1.65 bar) · Reference
- Wet grip (lab)
- 63
- Puncture
- –
- Weight
- 748 g
- 23.1 W at 24 psi (1.65 bar) · +1.3 W
- Wet grip (lab)
- 63
- Puncture
- –
- Weight
- 685 g
- 27.7 W at 24 psi (1.65 bar) · +5.9 W
- Wet grip (lab)
- 59
- Puncture
- –
- Weight
- 592 g
The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.
Three curves at most – hide one first.
Variants head to head
Every measured variant of the selected tires – the same model in another compound, width or casing sits right next to it. Empty fields mean no reliable measurement.
| Hutchinson Python RacePython Race Racing Lab 2.4 | 24.5 W | – | 592 g |
| Schwalbe Racing RayRacing Ray Super Ground Addix SpeedGrip 2.25 | 20.4 W | – | 685 g |
| Schwalbe Racing RayRacing Ray Super Race 2.35 | 19.3 W | – | 748 g |
Charts
Rolling resistance (fewer watts is better)
Impact protection (higher is better)
No values are available for this selection.
Editorial rating (higher is better)
TestedYour build – derived
Recommendation by use
- Fast laps and long climbs: Schwalbe Racing Ray rolls easier at 19.3 W.
- Wet roots and slippery ground: Schwalbe Racing Ray has the better wet grip.
Tested
- Rolling resistance: Schwalbe Racing Ray leads with 19.3 W, Hutchinson Python Race trails by 5.2 W.
- Wet grip measurement: Schwalbe Racing Ray leads with 63 points, Hutchinson Python Race trails by 4 points.
- Weighed weight: Hutchinson Python Race leads with 592 g, Schwalbe Racing Ray trails by 156 g.
Tests and sources
No test references are on file for these two tires yet.