Image: manufacturer · Source
Continental
Tested
Mid-field
46.5 W · rank 16 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
19.1 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Editorial assessment on a 1–10 scale. Grip index: –
No editorial scores
There are no 1–10 scores for this tire yet. We do not invent values.
Laboratory measurements are available – see the measurements block.
How we rateNo data
There are no 1–10 scores for this tire yet. We do not invent values.
Every variant the manufacturer lists, with its own claimed data. Missing values stay blank.
| 27.5" | 2.4" · 60 mm | Trail(Trail) | Endurance | 1005 g | E-25 | €65 |
| 27.5" | 2.4" · 60 mm | Enduro(Enduro) | Soft | 1095 g | E-25 | €77 |
| 27.5" | 2.4" · 60 mm | Downhill(Downhill) | SuperSoft | 1260 g | E-25 | €92 |
| 27.5" | 2.4" · 60 mm | Downhill(Downhill) | Soft | 1260 g | E-25 | €87 |
| 27.5" | 2.6" · 65 mm | Trail(Trail) | Endurance | 1160 g | E-25 | €70 |
| 27.5" | 2.6" · 65 mm | Enduro(Enduro) | Soft | 1240 g | E-25 | €82 |
| 29" | 2.4" · 60 mm | Trail(Trail) | Endurance | 1060 g | E-25 | €65 |
| 29" | 2.4" · 60 mm | Enduro(Enduro) | Soft | 1165 g | E-25 | €77 |
| 29" | 2.4" · 60 mm | Enduro(Enduro) | SuperSoft | 1205 g | E-25 | €82 |
| 29" | 2.4" · 60 mm | Downhill(Downhill) | SuperSoft | 1335 g | E-25 | €92 |
| 29" | 2.4" · 60 mm | Downhill(Downhill) | Soft | 1340 g | E-25 | €87 |
| 29" | 2.6" · 65 mm | Trail(Trail) | Endurance | 1240 g | E-25 | €70 |
| 29" | 2.6" · 65 mm | Enduro(Enduro) | Soft | 1315 g | E-25 | €82 |
The value in brackets is our brand-neutral casing class (Light, Trail, Enduro, Downhill) – not a manufacturer statement.
Real test-rig values – not an estimate. Tested variant: Argotal SuperSoft Compound Enduro-Casing 29 x 2.40.
Watts measured on the test rig: lower is better. The 1-10 ratings on this page: higher is better.
No lab of our own: measurements come from the third-party test named above – the source is linked directly.
Rank 16 of 31 · lower is better
Rank 30 of 33 · higher is better
Rank 13 of 31 · lower is better
Tested: Calculated from the stored measurements – compared only within the same test series and category (Enduro).
Mid-field
46.5 W · rank 16 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
19.1 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.
Weaker in comparison
19.5 % · rank 30 of 33 comparable Enduro tires
65.9 % behind the best value in the same test series. A higher percentage is better – the tire cushions hard edges for longer.
Mid-field
1,227 g · rank 13 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
245 g behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer grams is better, but usually costs casing stability.
In this test series the tire is below average for both rolling resistance and impact protection – other models do both better.
Measurements from different test rigs are not directly comparable – Sources & method.
Our own summaries – the full test is available at the source.
BIKE Magazin
February 2024In this short test, BIKE pairs the coarse Argotal at the front with the Kryptotal at the rear to see if it's the ideal combo for enduro riders. The Argotal proves especially strong on loose and soft terrain, providing plenty of confidence there. It is rated a clear recommendation for loose ground.
To the source
Maxxis
Schwalbe
Michelin
