MTB Tire Guide
Maxxis High Roller II MTB tire (Enduro, 29")

Image: manufacturer · Source

Maxxis

High Roller II

Enduro
Front+Rear
Aggressive
Tubeless ready
Short answer:

Tested

Weaker in comparison

52.8 W · rank 25 of 31 comparable Enduro tires

25.4 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.

Rampenförmige Stollen, guter Kompromiss aus Rollverhalten und Grip auf losem Untergrund.

Weight
1010 g
Variant
29x2.3 EXO
Compound
3C MaxxTerra
Grip class
Max Grip
Casing
EXO
TPI
60
Reinforcement
EXO
Wheel sizes
27.5", 29"
Widths
2.3", 2.5"
Front pressure
22–28 psi (1.52–1.93 bar)
Rear pressure
24–31 psi (1.65–2.14 bar)
Price (MSRP)
59–74 €
Model year
2013

Configure your build

Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.

Tire width
Wheel size
27.5" wheel
29" wheel
Casing
Compound
Pressure (context)
Measured point
Measured value available
How we calculate

Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.

Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).

More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.

Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.

Rating profile

All criteria rated

Editorial assessment on a 1–10 scale. Grip index: 8.3

Change build

TestedYour build – derived

These grades describe the tire model, not one specific width or compound – no reliable per-version grades exist.

Individual scores

  • Rolling resistance2.5/10
  • Wet grip7.8/10
  • Dry grip8.5/10
  • Cornering grip8.3/10
  • Braking traction8.5/10
  • Puncture protection6/10
  • Durability7.2/10
  • Comfort/damping7/10

Scores from 1 to 10: higher is better.

Basis of these scores: Redaktionelle Einschätzung auf Basis von Herstellerangaben und veröffentlichten Praxistests

Sizes & variants

Every variant the manufacturer lists, with its own claimed data. Missing values stay blank.

12 variants
27.5"2.3" · 58 mmEXO(Trail)Dual875 g
27.5"2.3" · 58 mmEXO(Trail)3C MaxxTerra888 g
27.5"2.4" · 61 mmEXO(Trail)3C MaxxTerra921 g
27.5"2.5" · 63 mmEXO(Trail)3C MaxxTerra966 g
27.5"2.5" · 63 mmDoubleDown(Enduro)3C MaxxTerra1183 g
27.5"2.6"EXO(Trail)3C MaxxTerra929 g
27.5"2.8" · 71 mmEXO(Trail)3C MaxxTerra936 g
27.5"2.8" · 71 mmEXO(Trail)Dual985 g
29"2.3" · 58 mmEXO(Trail)Dual939 g
29"2.3" · 58 mmEXO(Trail)3C MaxxTerra953 g
29"2.5" · 63 mmEXO(Trail)3C MaxxTerra1038 g
29"2.5" · 63 mmDoubleDown(Enduro)3C MaxxTerra1261 g

The value in brackets is our brand-neutral casing class (Light, Trail, Enduro, Downhill) – not a manufacturer statement.

Source: manufacturer data

Measured values

Lab data

Real test-rig values – not an estimate. Tested variant: High Roller 3C MaxxGrip DoubleDown 29 x 2.40 WT.

Watts measured on the test rig: lower is better. The 1-10 ratings on this page: higher is better.

No lab of our own: measurements come from the third-party test named above – the source is linked directly.

Rolling resistanceTest rig
52.8 W

Rank 25 of 31 · lower is better

Impact protectionScore from the impact test
53.5 %

Rank 7 of 33 · higher is better

Puncture force (mean)
507.6 N

Rank 5 of 14 · higher is better

Puncture force tread5 mm chisel
643.9 N
Puncture force sidewall5 mm chisel
549.5 N
Weighed weight
1268 g

Rank 18 of 31 · lower is better

Source: ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine Labortest 2025 · August 2025To the test

Automatic assessment

Tested: Calculated from the stored measurements – compared only within the same test series and category (Enduro).

  • Rolling resistance

    Weaker in comparison

    52.8 W · rank 25 of 31 comparable Enduro tires

    25.4 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.

  • Impact protection

    Strong in comparison

    53.5 % · rank 7 of 33 comparable Enduro tires

    32 % behind the best value in the same test series. A higher percentage is better – the tire cushions hard edges for longer.

  • Puncture resistance

    Mid-field

    507.6 N · rank 5 of 14 comparable Enduro tires

    89.7 N behind the best value in the same test series. More newtons is better – the casing withstands sharp rocks for longer.

  • Weighed weight

    Mid-field

    1,268 g · rank 18 of 31 comparable Enduro tires

    286 g behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer grams is better, but usually costs casing stability.

The familiar pattern: the high impact protection costs rolling resistance.

Measurements from different test rigs are not directly comparable – Sources & method.

Test reports

Our own summaries – the full test is available at the source.

Method description

ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest

January 2023

ENDURO's lab test measures 64 MTB tires under standardised conditions (20 km/h, 1.5 bar, 50 kg wheel load) for rolling resistance, pinch-flat protection and puncture resistance. Key takeaway: weight and pinch-flat protection are closely linked, while rolling resistance depends mainly on the rubber compound. Summarised in our own words; details and measured values at the original.

To the source

Magazine ride tests

MTB-News.de

August 2014

In the test of the Maxxis High Roller II in 27.5 x 2.30 inch with 3C MaxxTerra compound and EXO casing, the editors check whether the popular enduro tire has improved over its predecessor. The revised tread aims to deliver more grip and control.

To the source

Similar tires

Kenda Hellkat MTB tire (Enduro, 29")

Kenda

Hellkat

E-MTB
Enduro
Front+Rear
Aggressive
Weight
1230 g
Price
from €54
Grip
8.5/10
Rolling
5.4/10