Maxxis
Minion DHF
- Weight
- 1090 g
- Price
- from €69
- Grip
- 8.9/10
- Rolling
- 2.7/10

Image: manufacturer · Source
Michelin
Tested
Mid-field
42.5 W · rank 15 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
15.1 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Editorial assessment on a 1–10 scale. Grip index: –
No editorial scores
There are no 1–10 scores for this tire yet. We do not invent values.
Laboratory measurements are available – see the measurements block.
How we rateNo data
There are no 1–10 scores for this tire yet. We do not invent values.
Every variant the manufacturer lists, with its own claimed data. Missing values stay blank.
| 27.5" | 2.4" · 61 mm | Performance Line | 1165 g | rated | ||
| 27.5" | 2.4" · 61 mm | Racing Line(Light) | Magi-X | 1235 g | rated | |
| 29" | 2.4" · 61 mm | Performance Line | 1215 g | rated | ||
| 29" | 2.4" · 61 mm | Racing Line(Light) | Magi-X | 1290 g | rated |
The value in brackets is our brand-neutral casing class (Light, Trail, Enduro, Downhill) – not a manufacturer statement.
Real test-rig values – not an estimate. Tested variant: Wild Enduro MS RacingLine MAGI-X 29 x 2.40.
Watts measured on the test rig: lower is better. The 1-10 ratings on this page: higher is better.
No lab of our own: measurements come from the third-party test named above – the source is linked directly.
Rank 15 of 31 · lower is better
Rank 12 of 33 · higher is better
Rank 12 of 31 · lower is better
Tested: Calculated from the stored measurements – compared only within the same test series and category (Enduro).
Mid-field
42.5 W · rank 15 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
15.1 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.
Mid-field
48.9 % · rank 12 of 33 comparable Enduro tires
36.6 % behind the best value in the same test series. A higher percentage is better – the tire cushions hard edges for longer.
Mid-field
1,210 g · rank 12 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
228 g behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer grams is better, but usually costs casing stability.
Notable: below-average rolling resistance together with above-average impact protection – this tire breaks the usual trade-off.
Measurements from different test rigs are not directly comparable – Sources & method.
Maxxis
Schwalbe
Michelin