Image: manufacturer · Source

Michelin

Wild Enduro Rear

Name: Michelin Wild Enduro Rear
Brand: Michelin

Enduro

Rear

E-MTB rated

Tubeless ready

Tested

Strong in comparison

30.2 W · rank 4 of 31 comparable Enduro tires

2.8 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.

Weight: 1211 g
Variant: 29x2.4 Racing Line
Compound: Magi-X
Grip class: Balanced
Casing: DH Shield
TPI: 55
Reinforcement: –
Wheel sizes: 27.5", 29"
Widths: 2.4"
Front pressure: –
Rear pressure: –
Price (MSRP): 80–80 €
Model year: 2024

Calculate pressure for this tire View lab test Test reports

Configure your build

Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.

Pressure (context)

24.7 psi (1.70 bar)

Measured point

Measured value available

How we calculate

Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.

Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).

More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.

Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.

Rating profile

0 of 8 criteria rated

Editorial assessment on a 1–10 scale. Grip index: –

Change build

No editorial scores

There are no 1–10 scores for this tire yet. We do not invent values.

Laboratory measurements are available – see the measurements block.

How we rate

Individual scores

No data

Rolling resistance
Wet grip
Dry grip
Cornering grip
Braking traction
Puncture protection
Durability
Comfort/damping

There are no 1–10 scores for this tire yet. We do not invent values.

Sizes & variants

Every variant the manufacturer lists, with its own claimed data. Missing values stay blank.

2 variants


29"	2.4" · 61 mm	Performance Line		1165 g	rated
29"	2.4" · 61 mm	Racing Line(Light)	Magi-X	1225 g	rated

The value in brackets is our brand-neutral casing class (Light, Trail, Enduro, Downhill) – not a manufacturer statement.

Source: manufacturer data

Measured values

Lab data

Real test-rig values – not an estimate. Tested variant: Wild Enduro (Rear) RacingLine GUM-X3D 29 x 2.40.

Watts measured on the test rig: lower is better. The 1-10 ratings on this page: higher is better.

No lab of our own: measurements come from the third-party test named above – the source is linked directly.

Rolling resistanceTest rig: 30.2 W
Impact protectionScore from the impact test: 42.75 %
Weighed weight: 1183 g

Source: ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine Labortest 2025To the test

All tested versions

Test series: ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest 64 Reifen

Measured values per compound and casing from the same laboratory test. Empty cells mean no reliable value was published.


Wild Enduro (Rear) RacingLine GUM-X3D	29 x 2.40	30.2 W	42.75 %	1183 g	71.88 €
Wild Enduro Rear Competition Line	29 x 2.40	35.8 W	33.7 %	1220 g	67.47 €

Rolling resistance

lower is better

Wild Enduro (Rear) RacingLine GUM-X3D30.2 W
Wild Enduro Rear Competition Line35.8 W

Impact protection

higher is better

Wild Enduro (Rear) RacingLine GUM-X3D42.75 %
Wild Enduro Rear Competition Line33.7 %

Compounds & versions as curves

Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.

Choose pressure: 25 psi (1.72 bar)

30.2 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · Reference
Puncture
42.75 %
Weight
1183 g
35.8 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · +5.6 W
Puncture
33.7 %
Weight
1220 g

Without a lab test pressure we anchor the measured watt value at the recommended pressure. The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.

Gum-X

Hardness steps are our classification based on manufacturer information. All numbers come from lab tests; sources are linked on the tire pages. All information without warranty.

Automatic assessment

Tested: Calculated from the stored measurements – compared only within the same test series and category (Enduro).

Rolling resistance
Strong in comparison
30.2 W · rank 4 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
2.8 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.
Impact protection
Mid-field
42.8 % · rank 16 of 33 comparable Enduro tires
42.7 % behind the best value in the same test series. A higher percentage is better – the tire cushions hard edges for longer.
Weighed weight
Strong in comparison
1,183 g · rank 9 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
201 g behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer grams is better, but usually costs casing stability.

Notable: below-average rolling resistance together with above-average impact protection – this tire breaks the usual trade-off.

Measurements from different test rigs are not directly comparable – Sources & method.

Test reports

Our own summaries – the full test is available at the source.

Magazine ride tests

MTB-News.de

September 2019

Alongside the front tire, the article also covers the Michelin Wild Enduro Rear and its reinforced casing built for hard racing use. Testers describe traction under acceleration and wear behaviour over several rides. The rear tire is positioned as a reliable partner for aggressive riders.

To the source