Image: manufacturer · Source
Pirelli
Tested
Strong in comparison
32.1 W · rank 7 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
4.7 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.
Mixed-Terrain-Reifen mit ausgewogenem Profil und stabiler Karkasse.
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Editorial assessment on a 1–10 scale. Grip index: 8.2
These grades describe the tire model, not one specific width or compound – no reliable per-version grades exist.
Scores from 1 to 10: higher is better.
Basis of these scores: Redaktionelle Einschätzung auf Basis von Herstellerangaben und veröffentlichten Praxistests
Every variant the manufacturer lists, with its own claimed data. Missing values stay blank.
| 27.5" | 2.6" · 65 mm | HardWALL(Enduro) | SmartGRIP Gravity | 1100 g | ||
| 29" | 2.4" · 60 mm | ProWALL(Trail) | SmartGRIP Gravity | 990 g | ||
| 29" | 2.4" · 60 mm | HardWALL(Enduro) | SmartGRIP Gravity | 1100 g | ||
| 29" | 2.6" · 65 mm | ProWALL(Trail) | SmartGRIP Gravity | 1040 g | ||
| 29" | 2.6" · 65 mm | HardWALL(Enduro) | SmartGRIP Gravity | 1230 g |
The value in brackets is our brand-neutral casing class (Light, Trail, Enduro, Downhill) – not a manufacturer statement.
Real test-rig values – not an estimate. Tested variant: Scorpion Enduro M SmartGRIP Gravity HardWALL 29 x 2.40.
Watts measured on the test rig: lower is better. The 1-10 ratings on this page: higher is better.
No lab of our own: measurements come from the third-party test named above – the source is linked directly.
Rank 7 of 31 · lower is better
Rank 28 of 33 · higher is better
Rank 7 of 14 · higher is better
Best value · Rank 1 of 31 · lower is better
Tested: Calculated from the stored measurements – compared only within the same test series and category (Enduro).
Strong in comparison
32.1 W · rank 7 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
4.7 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.
Weaker in comparison
23.4 % · rank 28 of 33 comparable Enduro tires
62.1 % behind the best value in the same test series. A higher percentage is better – the tire cushions hard edges for longer.
Mid-field
462.9 N · rank 7 of 14 comparable Enduro tires
134.4 N behind the best value in the same test series. More newtons is better – the casing withstands sharp rocks for longer.
Strong in comparison
982 g · rank 1 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
Best value in this test series. Fewer grams is better, but usually costs casing stability.
The familiar pattern: the easy roll is paid for with less impact protection.
Measurements from different test rigs are not directly comparable – Sources & method.
Our own summaries – the full test is available at the source.
ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest
January 2023ENDURO's lab test measures 64 MTB tires under standardised conditions (20 km/h, 1.5 bar, 50 kg wheel load) for rolling resistance, pinch-flat protection and puncture resistance. Key takeaway: weight and pinch-flat protection are closely linked, while rolling resistance depends mainly on the rubber compound. Summarised in our own words; details and measured values at the original.
To the source
Maxxis
Schwalbe
Michelin
