Image: manufacturer · Source
Vee Tire
Tested
Weaker in comparison
52.4 W · rank 24 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
25 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Editorial assessment on a 1–10 scale. Grip index: –
No editorial scores
There are no 1–10 scores for this tire yet. We do not invent values.
Laboratory measurements are available – see the measurements block.
How we rateNo data
There are no 1–10 scores for this tire yet. We do not invent values.
Every variant the manufacturer lists, with its own claimed data. Missing values stay blank.
| 27.5" | 2.5" · 64 mm | Full 40 / GXE Core | 1220 g | E-25 | ||
| 29" | 2.5" · 64 mm | Full 40 / GXE Core | 1295 g | E-25 | ||
| 29" | 2.5" · 64 mm | Full 40 / DH Core(Downhill) | 1425 g | E-25 |
The value in brackets is our brand-neutral casing class (Light, Trail, Enduro, Downhill) – not a manufacturer statement.
Real test-rig values – not an estimate. Tested variant: Attack FSX Full 40 GXE 29 x 2.50.
Watts measured on the test rig: lower is better. The 1-10 ratings on this page: higher is better.
No lab of our own: measurements come from the third-party test named above – the source is linked directly.
Rank 24 of 31 · lower is better
Rank 22 of 33 · higher is better
Rank 15 of 31 · lower is better
Tested: Calculated from the stored measurements – compared only within the same test series and category (Enduro).
Weaker in comparison
52.4 W · rank 24 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
25 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.
Mid-field
31.2 % · rank 22 of 33 comparable Enduro tires
54.3 % behind the best value in the same test series. A higher percentage is better – the tire cushions hard edges for longer.
Mid-field
1,234 g · rank 15 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
252 g behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer grams is better, but usually costs casing stability.
In this test series the tire is below average for both rolling resistance and impact protection – other models do both better.
Measurements from different test rigs are not directly comparable – Sources & method.
Our own summaries – the full test is available at the source.
MTB-News.de
August 2023The Vee Tire Attack FSX was tested as the rear counterpart to the Snap WCE on enduro and downhill tracks. It proves versatile, offering solid rolling behavior with sufficient traction. This marks a successful entry for the Thai newcomer in the MTB segment.
To the source
Maxxis
Schwalbe
Michelin
