Image: manufacturer · Source
Vee Tire
Tested
Weaker in comparison
53.9 W · rank 27 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
26.5 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.
Preislich attraktiver Gravity-Reifen mit sehr weicher Mischung.
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Editorial assessment on a 1–10 scale. Grip index: 8.7
These grades describe the tire model, not one specific width or compound – no reliable per-version grades exist.
Scores from 1 to 10: higher is better.
Basis of these scores: Redaktionelle Einschätzung auf Basis von Herstellerangaben und veröffentlichten Praxistests
Every variant the manufacturer lists, with its own claimed data. Missing values stay blank.
| 27.5" | 2.5" · 64 mm | Full 40 / GXE Core | 1220 g | E-50 | ||
| 27.5" | 2.5" · 64 mm | Full 40 / DH Core(Downhill) | 1345 g | E-50 | ||
| 29" | 2.5" · 64 mm | Full 40 / GXE Core | 1295 g | E-50 | ||
| 29" | 2.5" · 64 mm | E-CTRL / Override Core | 1365 g | E-50 | ||
| 29" | 2.5" · 64 mm | Full 40 / DH Core(Downhill) | 1410 g | E-50 |
The value in brackets is our brand-neutral casing class (Light, Trail, Enduro, Downhill) – not a manufacturer statement.
Real test-rig values – not an estimate. Tested variant: Attack HPL Full 40 GXE 29 x 2.50.
Watts measured on the test rig: lower is better. The 1-10 ratings on this page: higher is better.
No lab of our own: measurements come from the third-party test named above – the source is linked directly.
Rank 27 of 31 · lower is better
Rank 26 of 33 · higher is better
Rank 12 of 14 · higher is better
Rank 19 of 31 · lower is better
Tested: Calculated from the stored measurements – compared only within the same test series and category (Enduro).
Weaker in comparison
53.9 W · rank 27 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
26.5 W behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer watts is better – every watt saved stays in the drivetrain.
Weaker in comparison
26.9 % · rank 26 of 33 comparable Enduro tires
58.6 % behind the best value in the same test series. A higher percentage is better – the tire cushions hard edges for longer.
Weaker in comparison
421.5 N · rank 12 of 14 comparable Enduro tires
175.8 N behind the best value in the same test series. More newtons is better – the casing withstands sharp rocks for longer.
Mid-field
1,289 g · rank 19 of 31 comparable Enduro tires
307 g behind the best value in the same test series. Fewer grams is better, but usually costs casing stability.
In this test series the tire is below average for both rolling resistance and impact protection – other models do both better.
Measurements from different test rigs are not directly comparable – Sources & method.
Our own summaries – the full test is available at the source.
ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest
January 2023ENDURO's lab test measures 64 MTB tires under standardised conditions (20 km/h, 1.5 bar, 50 kg wheel load) for rolling resistance, pinch-flat protection and puncture resistance. Key takeaway: weight and pinch-flat protection are closely linked, while rolling resistance depends mainly on the rubber compound. Summarised in our own words; details and measured values at the original.
To the source
Maxxis
Schwalbe
Michelin
