Continental Argotal
Enduro
Front
Continental Argotal vs Continental Kryptotal Rear
Short answer: Rolling resistance: Continental Kryptotal Rear leads with 33.2 W, Continental Argotal trails by 13.3 W.
Continental Kryptotal Rear
Enduro
Rear
Configure your build
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Continental Argotal
Continental Kryptotal Rear
Measured value available
How we calculate
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Continental Argotal: Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
Continental Kryptotal Rear: Reference: test pressure 24.7 psi (1.70 bar).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Size, weight and casing
| Continental Argotal | Continental Kryptotal Rear | |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 2.4" · 2.6" (60 · 65 mm) | 2.4" · 2.6" (60 · 65 mm) |
| Wheel sizes | 27.5" · 29" | 27.5" · 29" |
| Weight | 1,040 g (29x2.4 Trail Endurance) | 1,230 g (29x2.4 Enduro Soft) |
| Casing | Trail · 3-ply | Enduro Casing · Apex · 2-ply |
| Casing | Trail · Enduro · Downhill | Trail · Enduro · Downhill |
| TPI | 180 | 110 |
| Tread type | – | Aggressive |
| Tubeless ready | yes | yes |
| E-MTB approval | yes (E-25) | yes |
| Price from | €65 | €56 |
| Model year | 2022 | 2022 |
Rubber compounds
Hardness scale 1 = hard and fast to 5 = very soft and grippy (our own classification).
Both tires sit in the same grip class – the watt comparison is fair.
Both tires sit on the same step of our editorial hardness scale.
Lab data per version
| Continental Argotal | Continental Kryptotal Rear | |
|---|---|---|
| Rolling resistance (W) | 46.5 W | 33.2 W |
| Impact protection (%) | 19.5 % | 17.3 % |
| Puncture resistance (N) | – | 409.4 N |
| Weighed weight (g) | 1,227.0 g | 1,199.0 g |
These two tires have no measured values from the same test series. A direct comparison of numbers would not be sound.
Continental Argotal
Continental Kryptotal Rear
Compounds & versions as curves
Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.
- 30.9 W at 26 psi (1.79 bar) · Reference
- Puncture
- –
- Weight
- 1134 g
- 33.2 W at 26 psi (1.79 bar) · +2.3 W
- Puncture
- 17.29 %
- Weight
- 1199 g
- 29.3 W at 26 psi (1.79 bar) · -1.6 W
- Puncture
- 19.53 %
- Weight
- 1227 g
Without a lab test pressure we anchor the measured watt value at the recommended pressure. The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.
Three curves at most – hide one first.
Variants head to head
Every measured variant of the selected tires – the same model in another compound, width or casing sits right next to it. Empty fields mean no reliable measurement.
| Continental ArgotalArgotal SuperSoft Compound Enduro-Casing | 46.5 W | 19.53 % | 1227 g |
| Continental Kryptotal RearKryptotal Re Soft Enduro · BIKE-Labor | 30.9 W | – | 1134 g |
| Continental Kryptotal RearKryptotal-Re Soft Compound Enduro-Casing | 33.2 W | 17.29 % | 1199 g |
Charts
Rolling resistance (fewer watts is better)
Impact protection (higher is better)
Editorial rating (higher is better)
At least one tire is missing too many editorial scores for a radar profile. We never draw missing values as zero.
TestedYour build – derived
Recommendation by use
- Fast laps and long climbs: Continental Kryptotal Rear rolls easier at 33.2 W.
- Bike park, rocks and e-MTB: Continental Argotal protects better with 20% impact protection.
Tested
- Rolling resistance: Continental Kryptotal Rear leads with 33.2 W, Continental Argotal trails by 13.3 W.
- Impact protection: Continental Argotal leads with 19.5 %, Continental Kryptotal Rear trails by 2.2 %.
- Weighed weight: Continental Kryptotal Rear leads with 1,199 g, Continental Argotal trails by 28 g.
Tests and sources
Continental Argotal
In this short test, BIKE pairs the coarse Argotal at the front with the Kryptotal at the rear to see if it's the ideal combo for enduro riders. The Argotal proves especially strong on loose and soft terrain, providing plenty of confidence there. It is rated a clear recommendation for loose ground.
BIKE Magazin
Continental Kryptotal Rear
In this comparison test, the Kryptotal combo is examined as a trail tyre duo and compared against the Magnotal at the rear. Testers highlight the confident grip and the good balance between rolling resistance and traction. The combo is clearly recommended for demanding trails.
BIKE MagazinThe editors tested the Kryptotal as front and rear tyre in Enduro and DH casings over several months. It impresses with high grip on varying terrain and good puncture protection. Overall, the hype around Continental's all-rounder is judged to be justified.
MTB-News.deENDURO's lab test measures 64 MTB tires under standardised conditions (20 km/h, 1.5 bar, 50 kg wheel load) for rolling resistance, pinch-flat protection and puncture resistance. Key takeaway: weight and pinch-flat protection are closely linked, while rolling resistance depends mainly on the rubber compound. Summarised in our own words; details and measured values at the original.
ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest