Continental Kryptotal Front
Enduro
Front
Continental Kryptotal Front vs Michelin Wild Enduro Rear
Short answer: Rolling resistance: Michelin Wild Enduro Rear leads with 30.2 W, Continental Kryptotal Front trails by 5 W.
Michelin Wild Enduro Rear
Enduro
Rear
Configure your build
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Continental Kryptotal Front
Michelin Wild Enduro Rear
Measured value available
How we calculate
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Continental Kryptotal Front: Reference: test pressure 24.7 psi (1.70 bar).
Michelin Wild Enduro Rear: Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Size, weight and casing
| Continental Kryptotal Front | Michelin Wild Enduro Rear | |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 2.4" · 2.6" (60 · 65 mm) | 2.4" (61 mm) |
| Wheel sizes | 27.5" · 29" | 27.5" · 29" |
| Weight | 1,240 g (29x2.4 Enduro Soft) | 1,211 g (29x2.4 Racing Line) |
| Casing | Enduro Casing · Apex · 2-ply | DH Shield · 2-ply |
| Casing | Trail · Enduro · Downhill | Light |
| TPI | 110 | 55 |
| Tread type | Aggressive | – |
| Tubeless ready | yes | yes |
| E-MTB approval | yes | yes |
| Price from | €70 | €80 |
| Model year | 2022 | 2024 |
Rubber compounds
Hardness scale 1 = hard and fast to 5 = very soft and grippy (our own classification).
Different grip classes: the softer tire must roll slower. Read the watts with that in mind.
Continental Kryptotal Front offers the softer compound range – more grip, usually at the cost of wear.
Lab data per version
| Continental Kryptotal Front | Michelin Wild Enduro Rear | |
|---|---|---|
| Rolling resistance (W) | 35.2 W | 30.2 W |
| Impact protection (%) | 28.4 % | 42.8 % |
| Puncture resistance (N) | 420.4 N | – |
| Weighed weight (g) | 1,167.0 g | 1,183.0 g |
These two tires have no measured values from the same test series. A direct comparison of numbers would not be sound.
Continental Kryptotal Front
All tested versions
Test series: ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest 64 Reifen
Measured values per compound and casing from the same laboratory test. Empty cells mean no reliable value was published.
| Kryptotal-Fr Soft Compound Enduro-Casing | 29 x 2.40 | 35.2 W | 28.35 % | 1167 g | 69.95 € |
| Kryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Downhill-Casing | 29 x 2.40 | 41.5 W | 51.42 % | 1310 g | 89.95 € |
| Kryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Enduro-Casing | 29 x 2.40 | 42.3 W | 25.96 % | 1208 g | 81.95 € |
Rolling resistance
lower is better
- Kryptotal-Fr Soft Compound Enduro-Casing35.2 W
- Kryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Downhill-Casing41.5 W
- Kryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Enduro-Casing42.3 W
Impact protection
higher is better
- Kryptotal-Fr Soft Compound Enduro-Casing28.35 %
- Kryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Downhill-Casing51.42 %
- Kryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Enduro-Casing25.96 %
Michelin Wild Enduro Rear
All tested versions
Test series: ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest 64 Reifen
Measured values per compound and casing from the same laboratory test. Empty cells mean no reliable value was published.
| Wild Enduro (Rear) RacingLine GUM-X3D | 29 x 2.40 | 30.2 W | 42.75 % | 1183 g | 71.88 € |
| Wild Enduro Rear Competition Line | 29 x 2.40 | 35.8 W | 33.7 % | 1220 g | 67.47 € |
Rolling resistance
lower is better
- Wild Enduro (Rear) RacingLine GUM-X3D30.2 W
- Wild Enduro Rear Competition Line35.8 W
Impact protection
higher is better
- Wild Enduro (Rear) RacingLine GUM-X3D42.75 %
- Wild Enduro Rear Competition Line33.7 %
Compounds & versions as curves
Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.
- 30.2 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · Reference
- Puncture
- 42.75 %
- Weight
- 1183 g
- 35.2 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · +5.0 W
- Puncture
- 28.35 %
- Weight
- 1167 g
- 35.8 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · +5.6 W
- Puncture
- 33.7 %
- Weight
- 1220 g
- 40.1 W
- Puncture
- –
- Weight
- 1193 g
- 41.5 W
- Puncture
- 51.42 %
- Weight
- 1310 g
- 42.3 W
- Puncture
- 25.96 %
- Weight
- 1208 g
Without a lab test pressure we anchor the measured watt value at the recommended pressure. The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.
Three curves at most – hide one first.
Variants head to head
Every measured variant of the selected tires – the same model in another compound, width or casing sits right next to it. Empty fields mean no reliable measurement.
| Continental Kryptotal FrontKryptotal Fr Super Soft Enduro · BIKE-Labor | 40.1 W | – | 1193 g |
| Continental Kryptotal FrontKryptotal-Fr Soft Compound Enduro-Casing | 35.2 W | 28.35 % | 1167 g |
| Continental Kryptotal FrontKryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Downhill-Casing | 41.5 W | 51.42 % | 1310 g |
| Continental Kryptotal FrontKryptotal-Fr SuperSoft Compound Enduro-Casing | 42.3 W | 25.96 % | 1208 g |
| Michelin Wild Enduro RearWild Enduro (Rear) RacingLine GUM-X3D | 30.2 W | 42.75 % | 1183 g |
| Michelin Wild Enduro RearWild Enduro Rear Competition Line | 35.8 W | 33.7 % | 1220 g |
Charts
Rolling resistance (fewer watts is better)
Impact protection (higher is better)
Editorial rating (higher is better)
At least one tire is missing too many editorial scores for a radar profile. We never draw missing values as zero.
TestedYour build – derived
Recommendation by use
- Fast laps and long climbs: Michelin Wild Enduro Rear rolls easier at 30.2 W.
- Bike park, rocks and e-MTB: Michelin Wild Enduro Rear protects better with 43% impact protection.
Tested
- Rolling resistance: Michelin Wild Enduro Rear leads with 30.2 W, Continental Kryptotal Front trails by 5 W.
- Impact protection: Michelin Wild Enduro Rear leads with 42.8 %, Continental Kryptotal Front trails by 14.4 %.
- Weighed weight: Continental Kryptotal Front leads with 1,167 g, Michelin Wild Enduro Rear trails by 16 g.
Tests and sources
Continental Kryptotal Front
In the 2026 enduro tyre test, the Kryptotal Fr competes alongside the Kryptotal Re. Testers praise the predictable handling and reliable grip thanks to the super-soft compound and sturdy enduro casing. As an all-rounder for tough enduro riding, the Kryptotal convinces.
BIKE MagazinThe editors tested the Kryptotal as front and rear tyre in Enduro and DH casings over several months. It impresses with high grip on varying terrain and good puncture protection. Overall, the hype around Continental's all-rounder is judged to be justified.
MTB-News.deENDURO's lab test measures 64 MTB tires under standardised conditions (20 km/h, 1.5 bar, 50 kg wheel load) for rolling resistance, pinch-flat protection and puncture resistance. Key takeaway: weight and pinch-flat protection are closely linked, while rolling resistance depends mainly on the rubber compound. Summarised in our own words; details and measured values at the original.
ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest
Michelin Wild Enduro Rear
Alongside the front tire, the article also covers the Michelin Wild Enduro Rear and its reinforced casing built for hard racing use. Testers describe traction under acceleration and wear behaviour over several rides. The rear tire is positioned as a reliable partner for aggressive riders.
MTB-News.de