Continental Kryptotal Rear
Enduro
Rear
Continental Kryptotal Rear vs Michelin Wild Enduro Front
Short answer: Rolling resistance: Michelin Wild Enduro Front leads with 28.2 W, Continental Kryptotal Rear trails by 5 W.
Michelin Wild Enduro Front
Enduro
Front
Configure your build
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Continental Kryptotal Rear
Michelin Wild Enduro Front
Measured value available
How we calculate
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Continental Kryptotal Rear: Reference: test pressure 24.7 psi (1.70 bar).
Michelin Wild Enduro Front: Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Size, weight and casing
| Continental Kryptotal Rear | Michelin Wild Enduro Front | |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 2.4" · 2.6" (60 · 65 mm) | 2.4" (61 mm) |
| Wheel sizes | 27.5" · 29" | 27.5" · 29" |
| Weight | 1,230 g (29x2.4 Enduro Soft) | 1,160 g (29x2.4 Racing Line) |
| Casing | Enduro Casing · Apex · 2-ply | Gravity Shield · 2-ply |
| Casing | Trail · Enduro · Downhill | Enduro |
| TPI | 110 | 60 |
| Tread type | Aggressive | Aggressive |
| Tubeless ready | yes | yes |
| E-MTB approval | yes | yes |
| Price from | €56 | €64 |
| Model year | 2022 | 2018 |
Rubber compounds
Hardness scale 1 = hard and fast to 5 = very soft and grippy (our own classification).
Different grip classes: the softer tire must roll slower. Read the watts with that in mind.
Michelin Wild Enduro Front offers the softer compound range – more grip, usually at the cost of wear.
Lab data per version
| Continental Kryptotal Rear | Michelin Wild Enduro Front | |
|---|---|---|
| Rolling resistance (W) | 33.2 W | 28.2 W |
| Impact protection (%) | 17.3 % | 8.7 % |
| Puncture resistance (N) | 409.4 N | 426.4 N |
| Weighed weight (g) | 1,199.0 g | 1,049.0 g |
Continental Kryptotal Rear
Michelin Wild Enduro Front
All tested versions
Test series: ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest 64 Reifen
Measured values per compound and casing from the same laboratory test. Empty cells mean no reliable value was published.
| Wild Enduro Front Competition Line GUM-X3D | 29 x 2.40 | 28.2 W | 8.67 % | 1049 g | 63.43 € |
| Wild Enduro Front Competition Line MAGI-X2 | 29 x 2.40 | 44.6 W | 19.87 % | 1047 g | 67.71 € |
Rolling resistance
lower is better
- Wild Enduro Front Competition Line GUM-X3D28.2 W
- Wild Enduro Front Competition Line MAGI-X244.6 W
Impact protection
higher is better
- Wild Enduro Front Competition Line GUM-X3D8.67 %
- Wild Enduro Front Competition Line MAGI-X219.87 %
Compounds & versions as curves
Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.
- 28.2 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · Reference
- Puncture
- 8.67 %
- Weight
- 1049 g
- 31.9 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · +3.7 W
- Puncture
- –
- Weight
- 1134 g
- 34.3 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · +6.1 W
- Puncture
- 17.29 %
- Weight
- 1199 g
- 44.6 W
- Puncture
- 19.87 %
- Weight
- 1047 g
Without a lab test pressure we anchor the measured watt value at the recommended pressure. The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.
Three curves at most – hide one first.
Variants head to head
Every measured variant of the selected tires – the same model in another compound, width or casing sits right next to it. Empty fields mean no reliable measurement.
| Continental Kryptotal RearKryptotal Re Soft Enduro · BIKE-Labor | 30.9 W | – | 1134 g |
| Continental Kryptotal RearKryptotal-Re Soft Compound Enduro-Casing | 33.2 W | 17.29 % | 1199 g |
| Michelin Wild Enduro FrontWild Enduro Front Competition Line GUM-X3D | 28.2 W | 8.67 % | 1049 g |
| Michelin Wild Enduro FrontWild Enduro Front Competition Line MAGI-X2 | 44.6 W | 19.87 % | 1047 g |
Charts
Rolling resistance (fewer watts is better)
Impact protection (higher is better)
Editorial rating (higher is better)
TestedYour build – derived
Recommendation by use
- Fast laps and long climbs: Michelin Wild Enduro Front rolls easier at 28.2 W.
- Bike park, rocks and e-MTB: Continental Kryptotal Rear protects better with 17% impact protection.
- Wet roots and slippery ground: Michelin Wild Enduro Front has the better wet grip.
Tested
- Rolling resistance: Michelin Wild Enduro Front leads with 28.2 W, Continental Kryptotal Rear trails by 5 W.
- Impact protection: Continental Kryptotal Rear leads with 17.3 %, Michelin Wild Enduro Front trails by 8.6 %.
- Puncture resistance: Michelin Wild Enduro Front leads with 426.4 N, Continental Kryptotal Rear trails by 17 N.
- Weighed weight: Michelin Wild Enduro Front leads with 1,049 g, Continental Kryptotal Rear trails by 150 g.
Tests and sources
Continental Kryptotal Rear
In this comparison test, the Kryptotal combo is examined as a trail tyre duo and compared against the Magnotal at the rear. Testers highlight the confident grip and the good balance between rolling resistance and traction. The combo is clearly recommended for demanding trails.
BIKE MagazinThe editors tested the Kryptotal as front and rear tyre in Enduro and DH casings over several months. It impresses with high grip on varying terrain and good puncture protection. Overall, the hype around Continental's all-rounder is judged to be justified.
MTB-News.deENDURO's lab test measures 64 MTB tires under standardised conditions (20 km/h, 1.5 bar, 50 kg wheel load) for rolling resistance, pinch-flat protection and puncture resistance. Key takeaway: weight and pinch-flat protection are closely linked, while rolling resistance depends mainly on the rubber compound. Summarised in our own words; details and measured values at the original.
ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest
Michelin Wild Enduro Front
ENDURO's lab test measures 64 MTB tires under standardised conditions (20 km/h, 1.5 bar, 50 kg wheel load) for rolling resistance, pinch-flat protection and puncture resistance. Key takeaway: weight and pinch-flat protection are closely linked, while rolling resistance depends mainly on the rubber compound. Summarised in our own words; details and measured values at the original.
ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – LabortestThe review examines the Michelin Wild Enduro Front under tough enduro riding, describing its cornering and braking behaviour on changing terrain. The editors contextualize Michelin's comeback in the MTB tire market and compare rubber compounds and casing options. Overall the front tire is rated as solid but not outstanding.
MTB-News.de