Continental Kryptotal Rear
Enduro
Rear
Continental Kryptotal Rear vs Schwalbe Big Betty
Short answer: Rolling resistance: Schwalbe Big Betty leads with 31.3 W, Continental Kryptotal Rear trails by 1.9 W.
Schwalbe Big Betty
Enduro
Rear
Configure your build
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Continental Kryptotal Rear
Schwalbe Big Betty
Measured value available
How we calculate
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Continental Kryptotal Rear: Reference: test pressure 24.7 psi (1.70 bar).
Schwalbe Big Betty: Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Size, weight and casing
| Continental Kryptotal Rear | Schwalbe Big Betty | |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 2.4" · 2.6" (60 · 65 mm) | 2.4" (62 mm) |
| Wheel sizes | 27.5" · 29" | 27.5" · 29" |
| Weight | 1,230 g (29x2.4 Enduro Soft) | 1,265 g (29x2.4 Super Gravity) |
| Casing | Enduro Casing · Apex · 2-ply | Super Gravity · 2-ply |
| Casing | Trail · Enduro · Downhill | Enduro |
| TPI | 110 | 67 |
| Tread type | Aggressive | Aggressive |
| Tubeless ready | yes | yes |
| E-MTB approval | yes | yes |
| Price from | €56 | €74 |
| Model year | 2022 | 2020 |
Rubber compounds
Hardness scale 1 = hard and fast to 5 = very soft and grippy (our own classification).
Both tires sit in the same grip class – the watt comparison is fair.
Both tires sit on the same step of our editorial hardness scale.
Lab data per version
| Continental Kryptotal Rear | Schwalbe Big Betty | |
|---|---|---|
| Rolling resistance (W) | 33.2 W | 31.3 W |
| Impact protection (%) | 17.3 % | 64.2 % |
| Puncture resistance (N) | 409.4 N | 549.0 N |
| Weighed weight (g) | 1,199.0 g | 1,335.0 g |
Continental Kryptotal Rear
Schwalbe Big Betty
Compounds & versions as curves
Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.
- 30.9 W at 26 psi (1.79 bar) · Reference
- Puncture
- –
- Weight
- 1134 g
- 31.3 W at 26 psi (1.79 bar) · +0.4 W
- Puncture
- 64.17 %
- Weight
- 1335 g
- 33.2 W at 26 psi (1.79 bar) · +2.3 W
- Puncture
- 17.29 %
- Weight
- 1199 g
Without a lab test pressure we anchor the measured watt value at the recommended pressure. The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.
Three curves at most – hide one first.
Variants head to head
Every measured variant of the selected tires – the same model in another compound, width or casing sits right next to it. Empty fields mean no reliable measurement.
| Continental Kryptotal RearKryptotal Re Soft Enduro · BIKE-Labor | 30.9 W | – | 1134 g |
| Continental Kryptotal RearKryptotal-Re Soft Compound Enduro-Casing | 33.2 W | 17.29 % | 1199 g |
| Schwalbe Big BettyBig Betty ADDIX Soft Super Gravity | 31.3 W | 64.17 % | 1335 g |
Charts
Rolling resistance (fewer watts is better)
Impact protection (higher is better)
Editorial rating (higher is better)
TestedYour build – derived
Recommendation by use
- Fast laps and long climbs: Schwalbe Big Betty rolls easier at 31.3 W.
- Bike park, rocks and e-MTB: Schwalbe Big Betty protects better with 64% impact protection.
- Wet roots and slippery ground: Continental Kryptotal Rear has the better wet grip.
Tested
- Rolling resistance: Schwalbe Big Betty leads with 31.3 W, Continental Kryptotal Rear trails by 1.9 W.
- Impact protection: Schwalbe Big Betty leads with 64.2 %, Continental Kryptotal Rear trails by 46.9 %.
- Puncture resistance: Schwalbe Big Betty leads with 549 N, Continental Kryptotal Rear trails by 139.6 N.
- Weighed weight: Continental Kryptotal Rear leads with 1,199 g, Schwalbe Big Betty trails by 136 g.
Tests and sources
Continental Kryptotal Rear
In this comparison test, the Kryptotal combo is examined as a trail tyre duo and compared against the Magnotal at the rear. Testers highlight the confident grip and the good balance between rolling resistance and traction. The combo is clearly recommended for demanding trails.
BIKE MagazinThe editors tested the Kryptotal as front and rear tyre in Enduro and DH casings over several months. It impresses with high grip on varying terrain and good puncture protection. Overall, the hype around Continental's all-rounder is judged to be justified.
MTB-News.deENDURO's lab test measures 64 MTB tires under standardised conditions (20 km/h, 1.5 bar, 50 kg wheel load) for rolling resistance, pinch-flat protection and puncture resistance. Key takeaway: weight and pinch-flat protection are closely linked, while rolling resistance depends mainly on the rubber compound. Summarised in our own words; details and measured values at the original.
ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest
Schwalbe Big Betty
ENDURO's lab test measures 64 MTB tires under standardised conditions (20 km/h, 1.5 bar, 50 kg wheel load) for rolling resistance, pinch-flat protection and puncture resistance. Key takeaway: weight and pinch-flat protection are closely linked, while rolling resistance depends mainly on the rubber compound. Summarised in our own words; details and measured values at the original.
ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest