
Kenda Double Black vs Michelin Wild Enduro Rear
Short answer: Rolling resistance: Michelin Wild Enduro Rear leads with 30.2 W, Kenda Double Black trails by 0.6 W.


Michelin Wild Enduro Rear
Configure your build
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Kenda Double Black
Michelin Wild Enduro Rear
How we calculate
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Kenda Double Black: Reference: test pressure 24.7 psi (1.70 bar).
Michelin Wild Enduro Rear: Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Size, weight and casing
| Kenda Double Black | Michelin Wild Enduro Rear | |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 2.4" (61 mm) | 2.4" (61 mm) |
| Wheel sizes | 27.5" · 29" | 27.5" · 29" |
| Weight | 1,250 g (29x2.4 AGC) | 1,211 g (29x2.4 Racing Line) |
| Casing | AGC (Advanced Gravity Casing) · 1-ply | DH Shield · 2-ply |
| Casing | Trail · Enduro · Downhill | Light |
| TPI | 60 | 55 |
| Tread type | – | – |
| Tubeless ready | yes | yes |
| E-MTB approval | yes (E-25) | yes |
| Price from | €85 | €80 |
| Model year | 2024 | 2024 |
Rubber compounds
Hardness scale 1 = hard and fast to 5 = very soft and grippy (our own classification).
Both tires sit in the same grip class – the watt comparison is fair.
Both tires sit on the same step of our editorial hardness scale.
Lab data per version
| Kenda Double Black | Michelin Wild Enduro Rear | |
|---|---|---|
| Rolling resistance (W) | 30.8 W | 30.2 W |
| Impact protection (%) | 53.0 % | 42.8 % |
| Weighed weight (g) | 1,036.0 g | 1,183.0 g |
Kenda Double Black
All tested versions
Test series: ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest 64 Reifen
Measured values per compound and casing from the same laboratory test. Empty cells mean no reliable value was published.
| Double Black Dual Layer Compound Enduro | 29 x 2.40 | 41.6 W | 13.42 % | 1258 g | 82.9 € |
| Double Black Triple Compound All Mountain | 29 x 2.40 | 30.8 W | 53.03 % | 1036 g | 82.99 € |
Rolling resistance
lower is better
- Double Black Triple Compound All Mountain30.8 W
- Double Black Dual Layer Compound Enduro41.6 W
Impact protection
higher is better
- Double Black Triple Compound All Mountain53.03 %
- Double Black Dual Layer Compound Enduro13.42 %
Michelin Wild Enduro Rear
All tested versions
Test series: ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest 64 Reifen
Measured values per compound and casing from the same laboratory test. Empty cells mean no reliable value was published.
| Wild Enduro (Rear) RacingLine GUM-X3D | 29 x 2.40 | 30.2 W | 42.75 % | 1183 g | 71.88 € |
| Wild Enduro Rear Competition Line | 29 x 2.40 | 35.8 W | 33.7 % | 1220 g | 67.47 € |
Rolling resistance
lower is better
- Wild Enduro (Rear) RacingLine GUM-X3D30.2 W
- Wild Enduro Rear Competition Line35.8 W
Impact protection
higher is better
- Wild Enduro (Rear) RacingLine GUM-X3D42.75 %
- Wild Enduro Rear Competition Line33.7 %
Compounds & versions as curves
Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.
- 30.2 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · Reference
- Puncture
- 42.75 %
- Weight
- 1183 g
- 30.5 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · +0.3 W
- Puncture
- 53.03 %
- Weight
- 1036 g
- 35.8 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · +5.6 W
- Puncture
- 33.7 %
- Weight
- 1220 g
- 37.3 W
- Puncture
- –
- Weight
- 1174 g
- 41.6 W
- Puncture
- 13.42 %
- Weight
- 1258 g
Without a lab test pressure we anchor the measured watt value at the recommended pressure. The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.
Three curves at most – hide one first.
Variants head to head
Every measured variant of the selected tires – the same model in another compound, width or casing sits right next to it. Empty fields mean no reliable measurement.
| Kenda Double BlackDouble Black Dual Layer Compound Enduro | 41.6 W | 13.42 % | 1258 g |
| Kenda Double BlackDouble Black Pro Dualcompound AEC · BIKE-Labor | 37.3 W | – | 1174 g |
| Kenda Double BlackDouble Black Triple Compound All Mountain | 30.8 W | 53.03 % | 1036 g |
| Michelin Wild Enduro RearWild Enduro (Rear) RacingLine GUM-X3D | 30.2 W | 42.75 % | 1183 g |
| Michelin Wild Enduro RearWild Enduro Rear Competition Line | 35.8 W | 33.7 % | 1220 g |
Charts
Rolling resistance (fewer watts is better)
Impact protection (higher is better)
Editorial rating (higher is better)
At least one tire is missing too many editorial scores for a radar profile. We never draw missing values as zero.
Recommendation by use
- Fast laps and long climbs: Michelin Wild Enduro Rear rolls easier at 30.2 W.
- Bike park, rocks and e-MTB: Kenda Double Black protects better with 53% impact protection.
Tested
- Rolling resistance: Michelin Wild Enduro Rear leads with 30.2 W, Kenda Double Black trails by 0.6 W.
- Impact protection: Kenda Double Black leads with 53 %, Michelin Wild Enduro Rear trails by 10.3 %.
- Weighed weight: Kenda Double Black leads with 1,036 g, Michelin Wild Enduro Rear trails by 147 g.
Tests and sources
Kenda Double Black
The Kenda Double Black was tested in its Pro AEC version as an enduro tire for both front and rear use. It impresses with good rolling characteristics combined with strong puncture protection. This positions it as a solid, versatile option in the enduro segment.
BIKE Magazin
Michelin Wild Enduro Rear
Alongside the front tire, the article also covers the Michelin Wild Enduro Rear and its reinforced casing built for hard racing use. Testers describe traction under acceleration and wear behaviour over several rides. The rear tire is positioned as a reliable partner for aggressive riders.
MTB-News.de