
Continental Argotal vs Maxxis Assegai
Short answer: Rolling resistance: Continental Argotal leads with 46.5 W, Maxxis Assegai trails by 9.1 W.


Maxxis Assegai
Configure your build
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Continental Argotal
Maxxis Assegai
How we calculate
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Continental Argotal: Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
Maxxis Assegai: Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Size, weight and casing
| Continental Argotal | Maxxis Assegai | |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 2.4" · 2.6" (60 · 65 mm) | 2.5" (63 mm) |
| Wheel sizes | 27.5" · 29" | 27.5" · 29" |
| Weight | 1,040 g (29x2.4 Trail Endurance) | 1,290 g (29x2.5 WT DD) |
| Casing | Trail · 3-ply | DoubleDown · 2-ply |
| Casing | Trail · Enduro · Downhill | Trail · Enduro · Downhill |
| TPI | 180 | 120 |
| Tread type | – | Aggressive |
| Tubeless ready | yes | yes |
| E-MTB approval | yes (E-25) | yes |
| Price from | €65 | €74 |
| Model year | 2022 | 2019 |
Rubber compounds
Hardness scale 1 = hard and fast to 5 = very soft and grippy (our own classification).
Different grip classes: the softer tire must roll slower. Read the watts with that in mind.
Maxxis Assegai offers the softer compound range – more grip, usually at the cost of wear.
Lab data per version
| Continental Argotal | Maxxis Assegai | |
|---|---|---|
| Rolling resistance (W) | 46.5 W | 55.6 W |
| Impact protection (%) | 19.5 % | 51.8 % |
| Puncture resistance (N) | – | 462.7 N |
| Weighed weight (g) | 1,227.0 g | 1,401.0 g |
These two tires have no measured values from the same test series. A direct comparison of numbers would not be sound.
Continental Argotal
Maxxis Assegai
All tested versions
Test series: ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest 64 Reifen
Measured values per compound and casing from the same laboratory test. Empty cells mean no reliable value was published.
| Assegai 3C MaxxGrip DH Casing | 29 x 2.50 WT | 53.6 W | 79.9 % | 1440 g | 84.9 € |
| Assegai 3C MaxxGrip DoubleDown | 29 x 2.50 WT | 55.6 W | 51.79 % | 1401 g | 84.9 € |
| Assegai 3C MaxxGrip EXO+ Protection | 29 x 2.50 WT | 50.2 W | 23.98 % | 1211 g | 79.9 € |
| Assegai 3C MaxxTerra EXO Protection | 29 x 2.50 WT | 29.7 W | 12.35 % | 1109 g | 74.9 € |
Rolling resistance
lower is better
- Assegai 3C MaxxTerra EXO Protection29.7 W
- Assegai 3C MaxxGrip EXO+ Protection50.2 W
- Assegai 3C MaxxGrip DH Casing53.6 W
- Assegai 3C MaxxGrip DoubleDown55.6 W
Impact protection
higher is better
- Assegai 3C MaxxTerra EXO Protection12.35 %
- Assegai 3C MaxxGrip EXO+ Protection23.98 %
- Assegai 3C MaxxGrip DH Casing79.9 %
- Assegai 3C MaxxGrip DoubleDown51.79 %
Compounds & versions as curves
Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.
- 29.7 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · Reference
- Puncture
- 12.35 %
- Weight
- 1109 g
- 30.3 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · +0.6 W
- Puncture
- 19.53 %
- Weight
- 1227 g
- 50.2 W at 25 psi (1.72 bar) · +20.5 W
- Puncture
- 23.98 %
- Weight
- 1211 g
- 53.6 W
- Puncture
- 79.9 %
- Weight
- 1440 g
- 55.6 W
- Puncture
- 51.79 %
- Weight
- 1401 g
Without a lab test pressure we anchor the measured watt value at the recommended pressure. The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.
Three curves at most – hide one first.
Variants head to head
Every measured variant of the selected tires – the same model in another compound, width or casing sits right next to it. Empty fields mean no reliable measurement.
| Continental ArgotalArgotal SuperSoft Compound Enduro-Casing | 46.5 W | 19.53 % | 1227 g |
| Maxxis AssegaiAssegai 3C MaxxGrip DH Casing | 53.6 W | 79.9 % | 1440 g |
| Maxxis AssegaiAssegai 3C MaxxGrip DoubleDown | 55.6 W | 51.79 % | 1401 g |
| Maxxis AssegaiAssegai 3C MaxxGrip EXO+ Protection | 50.2 W | 23.98 % | 1211 g |
| Maxxis AssegaiAssegai 3C MaxxTerra EXO Protection | 29.7 W | 12.35 % | 1109 g |
Charts
Rolling resistance (fewer watts is better)
Impact protection (higher is better)
Editorial rating (higher is better)
At least one tire is missing too many editorial scores for a radar profile. We never draw missing values as zero.
Recommendation by use
- Fast laps and long climbs: Continental Argotal rolls easier at 46.5 W.
- Bike park, rocks and e-MTB: Maxxis Assegai protects better with 52% impact protection.
Tested
- Rolling resistance: Continental Argotal leads with 46.5 W, Maxxis Assegai trails by 9.1 W.
- Impact protection: Maxxis Assegai leads with 51.8 %, Continental Argotal trails by 32.3 %.
- Weighed weight: Continental Argotal leads with 1,227 g, Maxxis Assegai trails by 174 g.
Tests and sources
Continental Argotal
In this short test, BIKE pairs the coarse Argotal at the front with the Kryptotal at the rear to see if it's the ideal combo for enduro riders. The Argotal proves especially strong on loose and soft terrain, providing plenty of confidence there. It is rated a clear recommendation for loose ground.
BIKE Magazin
Maxxis Assegai
ENDURO's lab test measures 64 MTB tires under standardised conditions (20 km/h, 1.5 bar, 50 kg wheel load) for rolling resistance, pinch-flat protection and puncture resistance. Key takeaway: weight and pinch-flat protection are closely linked, while rolling resistance depends mainly on the rubber compound. Summarised in our own words; details and measured values at the original.
ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – LabortestCo-developed by Greg Minnaar, the Maxxis Assegai shows a balanced and confident ride feel with long-lasting grip in this test. When breaking away, it behaves noticeably softer and more controlled than, for example, the High Roller II.
BIKE Magazin