MTB Tire Guide

Continental Argotal vs Vee Tire Snap WLT

Short answer: Rolling resistance: Continental Argotal leads with 46.5 W, Vee Tire Snap WLT trails by 8.2 W.

Configure your build

Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.

Continental Argotal

Tire width
Wheel size
27.5" wheel
29" wheel
Casing
Compound
Pressure (context)
Measured point

Vee Tire Snap WLT

Tire width
Wheel size
27.5" wheel
29" wheel
Pressure (context)
Measured point
Measured value available
How we calculate

Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.

Continental Argotal: Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).

Vee Tire Snap WLT: Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).

More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.

Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.

Size, weight and casing

Continental ArgotalVee Tire Snap WLT
Width2.4" · 2.6" (60 · 65 mm)2.35" (60 mm)
Wheel sizes27.5" · 29"27.5" · 29"
Weight1,040 g (29x2.4 Trail Endurance)1,180 g (29x2.35 GXE Core Top40)
CasingTrail · 3-plyGXE Core
CasingTrail · Enduro · DownhillDownhill
TPI18090
Tread type––
Tubeless readyyesyes
E-MTB approvalyes (E-25)yes
Price from€65€65
Model year20222023

Rubber compounds

Hardness scale 1 = hard and fast to 5 = very soft and grippy (our own classification).

Continental Argotal

Grip class: Grip

Vee Tire Snap WLT

Grip class: Balanced

Different grip classes: the softer tire must roll slower. Read the watts with that in mind.

Continental Argotal offers the softer compound range – more grip, usually at the cost of wear.

Lab data per version

Continental ArgotalVee Tire Snap WLT
Rolling resistance (W)46.5 W
54.7 W
Impact protection (%)19.5 %
23.5 %
Weighed weight (g)1,227.0 g
1,123.0 g

Continental Argotal

Vee Tire Snap WLT

Compounds & versions as curves

Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.

12.346.179.9113.7147.6121927344249Pressure (psi)W
  • 46.5 W at 44 psi (3.03 bar) · Reference
    Puncture
    19.53 %
    Weight
    1227 g
  • 92.2 W at 44 psi (3.03 bar) · +45.7 W
    Puncture
    23.53 %
    Weight
    1123 g

Without a lab test pressure we anchor the measured watt value at the recommended pressure. The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.

Variants head to head

Every measured variant of the selected tires – the same model in another compound, width or casing sits right next to it. Empty fields mean no reliable measurement.

Continental ArgotalArgotal SuperSoft Compound Enduro-Casing46.5 W
19.53 %
1227 g
Vee Tire Snap WLTSnap WLT Full 40 GXE54.7 W
23.53 %
1123 g

Charts

Rolling resistance (fewer watts is better)

Impact protection (higher is better)

Editorial rating (higher is better)

At least one tire is missing too many editorial scores for a radar profile. We never draw missing values as zero.

TestedYour build – derived

Recommendation by use

  • Fast laps and long climbs: Continental Argotal rolls easier at 46.5 W.
  • Bike park, rocks and e-MTB: Vee Tire Snap WLT protects better with 24% impact protection.

Tested

  • Rolling resistance: Continental Argotal leads with 46.5 W, Vee Tire Snap WLT trails by 8.2 W.
  • Impact protection: Vee Tire Snap WLT leads with 23.5 %, Continental Argotal trails by 4 %.
  • Weighed weight: Vee Tire Snap WLT leads with 1,123 g, Continental Argotal trails by 104 g.

Tests and sources

Continental Argotal

  • In this short test, BIKE pairs the coarse Argotal at the front with the Kryptotal at the rear to see if it's the ideal combo for enduro riders. The Argotal proves especially strong on loose and soft terrain, providing plenty of confidence there. It is rated a clear recommendation for loose ground.

    BIKE Magazin

More head-to-heads