Continental Kryptotal Rear
Enduro
Rear
Continental Kryptotal Rear vs Michelin Wild Enduro MS
Short answer: Rolling resistance: Continental Kryptotal Rear leads with 33.2 W, Michelin Wild Enduro MS trails by 9.3 W.
Michelin Wild Enduro MS
Enduro
Front+Rear
Configure your build
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Continental Kryptotal Rear
Michelin Wild Enduro MS
Measured value available
How we calculate
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Continental Kryptotal Rear: Reference: test pressure 24.7 psi (1.70 bar).
Michelin Wild Enduro MS: Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Size, weight and casing
| Continental Kryptotal Rear | Michelin Wild Enduro MS | |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 2.4" · 2.6" (60 · 65 mm) | 2.4" (61 mm) |
| Wheel sizes | 27.5" · 29" | 27.5" · 29" |
| Weight | 1,230 g (29x2.4 Enduro Soft) | 1,264 g (29x2.4 Racing Line) |
| Casing | Enduro Casing · Apex · 2-ply | DH Shield · 2-ply |
| Casing | Trail · Enduro · Downhill | Light |
| TPI | 110 | 55 |
| Tread type | Aggressive | – |
| Tubeless ready | yes | yes |
| E-MTB approval | yes | yes |
| Price from | €56 | €80 |
| Model year | 2022 | 2024 |
Rubber compounds
Hardness scale 1 = hard and fast to 5 = very soft and grippy (our own classification).
Both tires sit in the same grip class – the watt comparison is fair.
Both tires sit on the same step of our editorial hardness scale.
Lab data per version
| Continental Kryptotal Rear | Michelin Wild Enduro MS | |
|---|---|---|
| Rolling resistance (W) | 33.2 W | 42.5 W |
| Impact protection (%) | 17.3 % | 48.9 % |
| Puncture resistance (N) | 409.4 N | – |
| Weighed weight (g) | 1,199.0 g | 1,210.0 g |
These two tires have no measured values from the same test series. A direct comparison of numbers would not be sound.
Continental Kryptotal Rear
Michelin Wild Enduro MS
Compounds & versions as curves
Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.
- 30.9 W at 26 psi (1.79 bar) · Reference
- Puncture
- –
- Weight
- 1134 g
- 33.2 W at 26 psi (1.79 bar) · +2.3 W
- Puncture
- 17.29 %
- Weight
- 1199 g
- 41.2 W at 26 psi (1.79 bar) · +10.3 W
- Puncture
- 48.87 %
- Weight
- 1210 g
Without a lab test pressure we anchor the measured watt value at the recommended pressure. The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.
Three curves at most – hide one first.
Variants head to head
Every measured variant of the selected tires – the same model in another compound, width or casing sits right next to it. Empty fields mean no reliable measurement.
| Continental Kryptotal RearKryptotal Re Soft Enduro · BIKE-Labor | 30.9 W | – | 1134 g |
| Continental Kryptotal RearKryptotal-Re Soft Compound Enduro-Casing | 33.2 W | 17.29 % | 1199 g |
| Michelin Wild Enduro MSWild Enduro MS RacingLine MAGI-X | 42.5 W | 48.87 % | 1210 g |
Charts
Rolling resistance (fewer watts is better)
Impact protection (higher is better)
Editorial rating (higher is better)
At least one tire is missing too many editorial scores for a radar profile. We never draw missing values as zero.
TestedYour build – derived
Recommendation by use
- Fast laps and long climbs: Continental Kryptotal Rear rolls easier at 33.2 W.
- Bike park, rocks and e-MTB: Michelin Wild Enduro MS protects better with 49% impact protection.
Tested
- Rolling resistance: Continental Kryptotal Rear leads with 33.2 W, Michelin Wild Enduro MS trails by 9.3 W.
- Impact protection: Michelin Wild Enduro MS leads with 48.9 %, Continental Kryptotal Rear trails by 31.6 %.
- Weighed weight: Continental Kryptotal Rear leads with 1,199 g, Michelin Wild Enduro MS trails by 11 g.
Tests and sources
Continental Kryptotal Rear
In this comparison test, the Kryptotal combo is examined as a trail tyre duo and compared against the Magnotal at the rear. Testers highlight the confident grip and the good balance between rolling resistance and traction. The combo is clearly recommended for demanding trails.
BIKE MagazinThe editors tested the Kryptotal as front and rear tyre in Enduro and DH casings over several months. It impresses with high grip on varying terrain and good puncture protection. Overall, the hype around Continental's all-rounder is judged to be justified.
MTB-News.deENDURO's lab test measures 64 MTB tires under standardised conditions (20 km/h, 1.5 bar, 50 kg wheel load) for rolling resistance, pinch-flat protection and puncture resistance. Key takeaway: weight and pinch-flat protection are closely linked, while rolling resistance depends mainly on the rubber compound. Summarised in our own words; details and measured values at the original.
ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – Labortest