MTB Tire Guide

Kenda Booster Pro vs Schwalbe Thunder Burt

Short answer: Rolling resistance: Schwalbe Thunder Burt leads with 17.3 W, Kenda Booster Pro trails by 18 W.

Configure your build

Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.

Kenda Booster Pro

Tire width
Wheel size
27.5" wheel
29" wheel
Pressure (context)
Measured point

Schwalbe Thunder Burt

Tire width
29" wheel
Casing
Pressure (context)
Measured point
Measured value available
How we calculate

Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.

Kenda Booster Pro: Reference: recommended pressure 24 psi (1.65 bar) – an assumption, not a test pressure.

Schwalbe Thunder Burt: Reference: recommended pressure 24 psi (1.65 bar) – an assumption, not a test pressure.

More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.

Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.

Size, weight and casing

Kenda Booster ProSchwalbe Thunder Burt
Width2.4" (61 mm)2.35" (60 mm)
Wheel sizes29" · 27.5"29" · 27.5"
Weight739 g701 g
CasingSCTSuper Race
Casing–Light · Trail
TPI––
Tread typeIntermediateSemi-Slick
Tubeless readyyesyes
E-MTB approvalnono
Price from€49€69
Model year20252026

Rubber compounds

Hardness scale 1 = hard and fast to 5 = very soft and grippy (our own classification).

Kenda Booster Pro

Grip class: Speed-Grip

Schwalbe Thunder Burt

Grip class: Speed · Speed-Grip

Both tires sit in the same grip class – the watt comparison is fair.

Both tires sit on the same step of our editorial hardness scale.

Lab data per version

Kenda Booster ProSchwalbe Thunder Burt
Rolling resistance (W)35.3 W
17.3 W
Wet grip measurement (points)67.0 points
67.0 points
Weighed weight (g)739.0 g
701.0 g

Kenda Booster Pro

Schwalbe Thunder Burt

All tested versions

Test series: Bicycle Rolling Resistance – MTB-Messreihe

Measured values per compound and casing from the same laboratory test. Empty cells mean no reliable value was published.

Thunder Burt Super Ground Addix Speed 2.129 x 2.1018.6 W
59
24
–50 mm613 g
–
Thunder Burt Super Ground Addix Speed 2.2529 x 2.2515.7 W
56
26
–53 mm680 g
–
Thunder Burt Super Race Addix Speed 2.129 x 2.1018.1 W
61
27
–50 mm611 g
–
Thunder Burt Super Race Addix Speed 2.3529 x 2.3517.3 W
67
31
–54 mm701 g
–

Wet grip is measured in the lab on a hard wet surface – it is not off-road grip.

Rolling resistance

lower is better

  • Thunder Burt Super Ground Addix Speed 2.2515.7 W
  • Thunder Burt Super Race Addix Speed 2.3517.3 W
  • Thunder Burt Super Race Addix Speed 2.118.1 W
  • Thunder Burt Super Ground Addix Speed 2.118.6 W

Compounds & versions as curves

Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.

10.820.129.438.748.1121927344249Pressure (psi)WBicycle Rolling Resistance: 15.7 W at 28 psi (1.93 bar) (measured)Bicycle Rolling Resistance: 17.3 W at 28 psi (1.93 bar) (measured)Bicycle Rolling Resistance: 18.1 W at 28 psi (1.93 bar) (measured)
  • 17.8 W at 24 psi (1.65 bar) · Reference
    Wet grip (lab)
    67
    Puncture
    –
    Weight
    680 g
  • 19.6 W at 24 psi (1.65 bar) · +1.8 W
    Wet grip (lab)
    67
    Puncture
    –
    Weight
    701 g
  • 20.5 W at 24 psi (1.65 bar) · +2.7 W
    Wet grip (lab)
    67
    Puncture
    –
    Weight
    611 g
  • 18.6 W
    Wet grip (lab)
    67
    Puncture
    –
    Weight
    613 g
  • 35.3 W
    Wet grip (lab)
    67
    Puncture
    –
    Weight
    739 g

The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.

Three curves at most – hide one first.

Variants head to head

Every measured variant of the selected tires – the same model in another compound, width or casing sits right next to it. Empty fields mean no reliable measurement.

Kenda Booster ProBooster Pro SCT 2.435.3 W
–739 g
Schwalbe Thunder BurtThunder Burt Super Ground Addix Speed 2.118.6 W
–613 g
Schwalbe Thunder BurtThunder Burt Super Ground Addix Speed 2.2515.7 W
–680 g
Schwalbe Thunder BurtThunder Burt Super Race Addix Speed 2.118.1 W
–611 g
Schwalbe Thunder BurtThunder Burt Super Race Addix Speed 2.3517.3 W
–701 g

Charts

Rolling resistance (fewer watts is better)

Impact protection (higher is better)

No values are available for this selection.

Editorial rating (higher is better)

TestedYour build – derived

Recommendation by use

  • Fast laps and long climbs: Schwalbe Thunder Burt rolls easier at 17.3 W.

Tested

  • Rolling resistance: Schwalbe Thunder Burt leads with 17.3 W, Kenda Booster Pro trails by 18 W.
  • Wet grip measurement: Kenda Booster Pro leads with 67 points, Schwalbe Thunder Burt trails by 0 points.
  • Weighed weight: Schwalbe Thunder Burt leads with 701 g, Kenda Booster Pro trails by 38 g.

Tests and sources

No test references are on file for these two tires yet.

More head-to-heads