Continental Argotal
Enduro
Front
Continental Argotal vs Maxxis High Roller II
Short answer: Rolling resistance: Continental Argotal leads with 46.5 W, Maxxis High Roller II trails by 6.3 W.
Maxxis High Roller II
Enduro
Front+Rear
Configure your build
Width, casing, compound and pressure – every value on this page follows your pick.
Continental Argotal
Maxxis High Roller II
Measured value available
How we calculate
Width, casing and compound decide how a tire really rides. We only show what was actually measured – and label estimates honestly.
Continental Argotal: Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
Maxxis High Roller II: Reference: documented test pressure of the source (24.7 psi (1.70 bar)).
More pressure: less rolling resistance, less grip, less comfort. Tougher casing: more protection, more weight. Softer compound: more grip, more rolling resistance.
Modelled values are assumptions based on the stated measurement points – not a lab test.
Size, weight and casing
| Continental Argotal | Maxxis High Roller II | |
|---|---|---|
| Width | 2.4" · 2.6" (60 · 65 mm) | 2.3" · 2.5" (58 · 63 mm) |
| Wheel sizes | 27.5" · 29" | 27.5" · 29" |
| Weight | 1,040 g (29x2.4 Trail Endurance) | 1,010 g (29x2.3 EXO) |
| Casing | Trail · 3-ply | EXO · 1-ply |
| Casing | Trail · Enduro · Downhill | Trail · Enduro |
| TPI | 180 | 60 |
| Tread type | – | Aggressive |
| Tubeless ready | yes | yes |
| E-MTB approval | yes (E-25) | no |
| Price from | €65 | €59 |
| Model year | 2022 | 2013 |
Rubber compounds
Hardness scale 1 = hard and fast to 5 = very soft and grippy (our own classification).
Different grip classes: the softer tire must roll slower. Read the watts with that in mind.
Maxxis High Roller II offers the softer compound range – more grip, usually at the cost of wear.
Lab data per version
| Continental Argotal | Maxxis High Roller II | |
|---|---|---|
| Rolling resistance (W) | 46.5 W | 52.8 W |
| Impact protection (%) | 19.5 % | 53.5 % |
| Puncture resistance (N) | – | 507.6 N |
| Weighed weight (g) | 1,227.0 g | 1,268.0 g |
These two tires have no measured values from the same test series. A direct comparison of numbers would not be sound.
Continental Argotal
Maxxis High Roller II
Compounds & versions as curves
Up to three versions at once: the curve is modelled rolling resistance across pressure, the dot is the real lab measurement. Click the legend to show or hide a version.
- 46.5 W at 44 psi (3.03 bar) · Reference
- Puncture
- 19.53 %
- Weight
- 1227 g
- 86.3 W at 44 psi (3.03 bar) · +39.8 W
- Puncture
- 53.5 %
- Weight
- 1268 g
Without a lab test pressure we anchor the measured watt value at the recommended pressure. The curve shape is a physics model, not a measurement. Labs do not measure grip across pressure – we do not invent that curve. Wet grip is a lab value per tire model, not per version.
Variants head to head
Every measured variant of the selected tires – the same model in another compound, width or casing sits right next to it. Empty fields mean no reliable measurement.
| Continental ArgotalArgotal SuperSoft Compound Enduro-Casing | 46.5 W | 19.53 % | 1227 g |
| Maxxis High Roller IIHigh Roller 3C MaxxGrip DoubleDown | 52.8 W | 53.5 % | 1268 g |
Charts
Rolling resistance (fewer watts is better)
Impact protection (higher is better)
Editorial rating (higher is better)
At least one tire is missing too many editorial scores for a radar profile. We never draw missing values as zero.
TestedYour build – derived
Recommendation by use
- Fast laps and long climbs: Continental Argotal rolls easier at 46.5 W.
- Bike park, rocks and e-MTB: Maxxis High Roller II protects better with 54% impact protection.
- Only Continental Argotal is approved for e-MTB use by the manufacturer.
Tested
- Rolling resistance: Continental Argotal leads with 46.5 W, Maxxis High Roller II trails by 6.3 W.
- Impact protection: Maxxis High Roller II leads with 53.5 %, Continental Argotal trails by 34 %.
- Weighed weight: Continental Argotal leads with 1,227 g, Maxxis High Roller II trails by 41 g.
Tests and sources
Continental Argotal
In this short test, BIKE pairs the coarse Argotal at the front with the Kryptotal at the rear to see if it's the ideal combo for enduro riders. The Argotal proves especially strong on loose and soft terrain, providing plenty of confidence there. It is rated a clear recommendation for loose ground.
BIKE Magazin
Maxxis High Roller II
ENDURO's lab test measures 64 MTB tires under standardised conditions (20 km/h, 1.5 bar, 50 kg wheel load) for rolling resistance, pinch-flat protection and puncture resistance. Key takeaway: weight and pinch-flat protection are closely linked, while rolling resistance depends mainly on the rubber compound. Summarised in our own words; details and measured values at the original.
ENDURO Mountainbike Magazine – LabortestIn the test of the Maxxis High Roller II in 27.5 x 2.30 inch with 3C MaxxTerra compound and EXO casing, the editors check whether the popular enduro tire has improved over its predecessor. The revised tread aims to deliver more grip and control.
MTB-News.de